[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
I've been a member of numerous citizens advisory boards, most in Manhattan. They've been set up in numerous ways. The first was an outgrowth of an offiicial citizens' advisory committee set up under 208 water quality planning by EPA in the 1970s. It lasted another 10 years or so, held forums and advised the city council, and for one year advised the City DEP officially. This body was voluntary and everyone was accepted for membership. I used this body to propose and help pass legislation to eliminate 2200 apartment building incinerators in New York City (signed 1989, implemented 1993). The NYC Sanitation dept. set up five CAC's (one for each borough) to evaluate its incinerator plans and then Local Law 19 of 1989 set up five citizens' solid waste advisory boards plus a citywide recycling advisory board. I have the parts of Local Law 19 on my website, below. These were strictly advisory and the Sanitation dept. would sometimes send an employee to meetings, but mostly ignored the boards and its recommendations. The City Council paid attention and often agreed with the boards. I was on Manhattan's since 1988 as chair for 2 and vice chair for 6, and the citywide since 1990, having testified numerous times and having secured funding for the boards from the City Council a few years ago. For most of the time, these bodies decided for themselves how to organize themselves, what was important to debate, which items to testify to the city council about, and so forth. Recently the Manhattan board underwent major change, and many of the long-standing members, most of whom had been leaders, either didn't reapply or were outright rejected by the Manhattan Borough President, when they reapplied for membership (an unprecedented action for any of the boards), and were replaced by business and real estate interests. More about some of these boards and LL19 are on one of my websites: http://geography.hunter.cuny.edu/~mclarke/WPComm.htm The bodies have been responsible for recommending important improvements to the city's waste prevention and recycling programs and solid waste management plans that have been eventually implemented (e.g., weekly recycling, targeting bulk paper) though credit to the bodies was never given. Many members left the bodies along the way because it was thankless. In Philadelphia there is a RAC (Recycling advisory committee, I believe). I have fewer details on this, but I understand that in the beginning, this was a very powerful body that created recycling policy for the city, and the City's Streets dept. would implement the policies that the RAC created. This was later changed, and I'm not sure what happened to the body after that. Maggie Clarke, Ph.D. www.maggieclarkeenvironmental.com > >What sort of document might be appropriate to dictate roles and > >responsibilities, ensuring that the recommendations of the committee > >will be implemented by the County, whenever appropriate, if we are not > >able to form a legally/technically defined Citizens Advisory Committee? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]