[GreenYes] Re: Earth Policy News - Bottled Water: Pouring Resources Down the Drain

[Mark Snyder <snyde043@no.address>]

This is all well and good, but the impression I get from this release is
that this organization would like to do away with the bottled-water industry
because they consider it to be so wasteful. Does anyone actually see that
happening?

I think the key issue that is overlooked is that, like bottled sodas or
juices, one of the main reasons people buy bottled water is the convenience
factor. I think that's a much bigger issue that needs to be addressed than
any perception of bottled water being "healthier" than tap water. The
release does nothing to address that.

If the Earth Policy Institute wants to actually make a difference, a better
approach would probably be to partner with a distributor such as
Reusablebags.com or a manufacturer such as SIGG or Nalgene to promote
greater use of reusable bottles. All this release does is complain a lot
without offering any solutions or opportunities to make changes, which means
for the most part, it will be ignored.

Mark Snyder
Minneapolis, MN

On 2/3/06, Pat Franklin <pfranklin@no.address> wrote:
>
>
>
> Fyi in case you haven't already seen this.
>
>
>
> Eco-Economy Update 2006-1
>
> For Immediate Release
>
> February 2, 2006
>
>
>
> BOTTLED WATER: POURING RESOURCES DOWN THE DRAIN
>
> http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/2006/Update51.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> By Emily Arnold
>
>
>
>
>
> The global consumption of bottled water reached 154 billion liters (41
>
> billion gallons) in 2004, up 57 percent from the 98 billion liters
>
> consumed five years earlier. Even in areas where tap water is safe to
>
> drink, demand for bottled water is increasing—producing unnecessary
>
> garbage and consuming vast quantities of energy. Although in the
>
> industrial world bottled water is often no healthier than tap water, it
>
> can cost up to 10,000 times more. At as much as $2.50 per liter ($10 per
>
> gallon), bottled water costs more than gasoline.
>
>
>
> The United States is the world's leading consumer of bottled water, with
>
> Americans drinking 26 billion liters in 2004, or approximately one 8-ounce
>
> glass per person every day. Mexico has the second highest consumption, at
>
> 18 billion liters. China and Brazil follow, at close to 12 billion liters
>
> each. Ranking fifth and sixth in consumption are Italy and Germany, using
>
> just over 10 billion liters of bottled water each. (See data at
>
> www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update51_data.htm.)
>
>
>
> Italians drink the most bottled water per person, at nearly 184 liters in
>
> 2004—more than two glasses a day. Mexico and the United Arab Emirates
>
> consume 169 and 164 liters per person. Belgium and France follow close
>
> behind, with per capita consumption near 145 liters annually. Spain ranks
>
> sixth, at 137 liters each year.
>
>
>
> Some of the largest increases in bottled water consumption have occurred
>
> in developing countries. Of the top 15 per capita consumers of bottled
>
> water, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates, and Mexico have the fastest
>
> growth rates, with consumption per person increasing by 44–50 percent
>
> between 1999 and 2004. While per capita rates in India and China are not
>
> as high, total consumption in these populous countries has risen
>
> swiftly—tripling in India and more than doubling in China in that
>
> five-year period. And there is great potential for further growth. If
>
> everyone in China drank 100 8-ounce glasses of bottled water a year
>
> (slightly more than one fourth the amount consumed by the average American
>
> in 2004), China would go through some 31 billion liters of bottled water,
>
> quickly becoming the world's leading consumer.
>
>
>
> In contrast to tap water, which is distributed through an energy-efficient
>
> infrastructure, transporting bottled water long distances involves burning
>
> massive quantities of fossil fuels. Nearly a quarter of all bottled water
>
> crosses national borders to reach consumers, transported by boat, train,
>
> and truck. In 2004, for example, Nord Water of Finland bottled and shipped
>
> 1.4 million bottles of Finnish tap water 4,300 kilometers (2,700 miles)
>
> from its bottling plant in Helsinki to Saudi Arabia.
>
>
>
> Saudi Arabia can afford to import the water it needs, but bottled water is
>
> not just sold to water-scarce countries. While some 94 percent of the
>
> bottled water sold in the United States is produced domestically,
>
> Americans also import water shipped some 9,000 kilometers from Fiji and
>
> other faraway places to satisfy the demand for chic and exotic bottled
>
> water.
>
>
>
> Fossil fuels are also used in the packaging of water. The most commonly
>
> used plastic for making water bottles is polyethylene terephthalate (PET),
>
> which is derived from crude oil. Making bottles to meet Americans' demand
>
> for bottled water requires more than 1.5 million barrels of oil annually,
>
> enough to fuel some 100,000 U.S. cars for a year. Worldwide, some 2.7
>
> million tons of plastic are used to bottle water each year.
>
>
>
> After the water has been consumed, the plastic bottle must be disposed of.
>
> According to the Container Recycling Institute, 86 percent of plastic
>
> water bottles used in the United States become garbage or litter.
>
> Incinerating used bottles produces toxic byproducts such as chlorine gas
>
> and ash containing heavy metals. Buried water bottles can take up to 1,000
>
> years to biodegrade. Almost 40 percent of the PET bottles that were
>
> deposited for recycling in the United States in 2004 were actually
>
> exported, sometimes to as far away as China—adding to the resources used
>
> by this product.
>
>
>
> In addition to the strains bottled water puts on our ecosystem through its
>
> production and transport, the rapid growth in this industry means that
>
> water extraction is concentrated in communities where bottling plants are
>
> located. In India, for example, water extraction by Coca-Cola for Dasani
>
> bottled water and other drinks has caused water shortages for over 50
>
> villages. Similar problems have been reported in Texas and in the Great
>
> Lakes region of North America, where farmers, fishers, and others who
>
> depend on water for their livelihoods are suffering from concentrated
>
> water extraction as water tables drop quickly.
>
>
>
> Studies show that consumers associate bottled water with healthy living.
>
> But bottled water is not guaranteed to be any healthier than tap water. In
>
> fact, roughly 40 percent of bottled water begins as tap water; often the
>
> only difference is added minerals that have no marked health benefit. The
>
> French Senate even advises people who drink bottled mineral water to
>
> change brands frequently because the added minerals are helpful in small
>
> amounts but may be dangerous in higher doses.
>
>
>
> The French Senate also noted that small, localized problems with tap water
>
> can cause a widespread loss of confidence in municipal supplies. In fact,
>
> in a number of places, including Europe and the United States, there are
>
> more regulations governing the quality of tap water than bottled water.
>
> U.S. water quality standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency
>
> for tap water, for instance, are more stringent than the Food and Drug
>
> Administration's standards for bottled water.
>
>
>
>             There is no question that clean, affordable drinking water is
> essential
>
> to the health of our global community. But bottled water is not the answer
>
> in the developed world, nor does it solve problems for the 1.1 billion
>
> people who lack a secure water supply. Improving and expanding existing
>
> water treatment and sanitation systems is more likely to provide safe and
>
> sustainable sources of water over the long term. In villages, rainwater
>
> harvesting and digging new wells can create more affordable sources of
>
> water.
>
>
>
>             The United Nations Millennium Development Goal for
> environmental
>
> sustainability calls for halving the proportion of people lacking
>
> sustainable access to safe drinking water by 2015. Meeting this goal would
>
> require doubling the $15 billion a year that the world currently spends on
>
> water supply and sanitation. While this amount may seem large, it pales in
>
> comparison to the estimated $100 billion spent each year on bottled water.
>
>
>
>
>
> #    #   #
>
>
>
> Additional data and information sources at www.earthpolicy.org or contact
>
> jlarsen@no.address
>
>
>
> For reprint permission contact rjkauffman@no.address
>
> ---
>
>
>