[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Jon thanks for your thoughts. I think Paul Palmer would be a good contributor to your planned book. Neil On Nov 6, 2006, at 6:26 PM, J. Michael Huls wrote: > Neil, > > I think the primary intent of the article of the researchers > describing the > dissappearance of fish from the oceans, was to spark some action > from people > on the basis that our food supply was disappearing. It won't be > that fish > will disappear, as there are many fish that we don't eat. But the > diversity > of the oceans will be severely degraded, and along with that the > ecosystem > itself will be significantly harmed. I guess it always helps to > ring the > alarm that our food is going...away. > > Nonetheless, the articles appearing about food shortage and > plastics in the > oceans is timely, and should be discussed in the context of past > degradation. Degradation is not recent phenomena but something > that has > been occuring for decades if not centuries. As an example, John > Muir wrote > about 100 years ago about the skies being covered for days in Southern > California with many types and species of migrating birds. Today, > in So Cal > we are lucky to see sparrows and black birds (a coule of very hardy > species), and at specific estuaries, a few other species such as > ducks. One > bird we see a lot of is sea gull, a species that has made quite a > living at > our open dumps (and I mean landfills). > > Speaking of estuary, little more than 2% to 4% of the original > estauary in > Southern California remains, which has had an even greater devestating > impact upon the oceans since the Southern California esturine > environment > had to be one of the more important areas in the world (they call it > Mediterrean because it only occurs in one other spot). This damage > to our > estuaries is probably even more critical than the plastics; but > again, it is > the issue of so many impacts -- loss of estuary, loss of diversity in > species, plastics, pesticides, toxic chemicals, over fishing, air > pollution > deposition on oceans, etc -- that make it so difficult for biological > systems to operate. The one thing that is curiously reflected in the > articles on global warming, fishing, and plastics is that every > author makes > it a point to state that the condition is reversible. I don't know > about > that. We're on a moving train that has gathered a lot of inertia > over the > past 50 years since the advent of the throwaway ethic that Neil and > I wrote > about in 1980 for a Environment Magazine. This inertia is based on > wasting as the foundation of our culture and economy. And that > will be a > significant hurdle to jump given the fact that our society is no > longer > manufacturing based (70% of our industry has moved elsewhere), but > instead > consumption based. It seems about 40 years ago, our nation > consumed about > 40% of the world's resourcs, and yet today, we are only consuming 25%. > Either we are consuming less (I doubt that) or the rest of the > world is > catching up to our grandiose lifestyle. And our curious mechanisms of > environmental protection. > > In fact, I am beginning a book on the American Environmental > Experience, > much of which is characterized by cover up, dismissal of impacts, and > leaving to the future the gross negative impacts, just so we can > make a > buck. It's not pretty, and certainly so many other countries > around the > world are looking at what a marvelous job we're doing -- opps, did > I forget > to mention the DDT dumps right off the coast at Palos Verdes, or > the sand we > cannot dredge in the Mississippi River Delta due to toxic matter > that we > don't want to stir up, or the BKK dump in West Covina that was used to > co-dispose chemical hzardous waste and MSW (to act like a sponge), > or the > many other myriad oftoxic travesties that are known by certain > leaders, just > not by the public? > > To that end, if anyone would like to be part of this book, let me > know. It > is being proposed for a national magazine and I would like many more > examples of the troubles that I believe lie ahead of us and that > should be > documented. At least for others around the world to learn of and > avoid. > Oh, yes, all of this is reversible... > > > J. Michael Huls, REA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Seldman [mailto:nseldman@no.address] > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:22 PM > To: Nancy Strauss > Cc: tedd@no.address; Dan Knapp; michael@no.address; > stephanie.barger@no.address; Justin Stockdale; Matthew > Cotton; Pete > Pasterz; RicAnthony@no.address; stevew@no.address; > gary@no.address; > crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; > zwia@no.address; > ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; ZERI-US@no.address; > sustainablebusiness@no.address; marc.gunther@no.address; > cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; > stephanie@no.address; > Anna Cummins; Brenda Platt; Debra Hagstrom; Jonathan Parfrey; Raymond > Halowski; Steve Mosko; Stuart Moody > Subject: Re: [CRRA] Plastics in the ocean > > Will the fact that fish will disappear in 50 years---as reported in > the > media---help our cause? > > Neil > > On Nov 6, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Nancy Strauss wrote: > >> Captain Charles Moore has been at this for quite some time.... >> http://www.algalita.org/research.html >> >> I think it comes down to a diversified way of dealing with litter, >> illegal dumping and educating the public and businesses about what is >> happening. >> >> Nancy >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: crra_members@no.address >> [mailto:crra_members@no.address] >> On Behalf Of Tedd Ward >> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 1:14 PM >> To: 'Dan Knapp'; michael@no.address >> Cc: stephanie.barger@no.address; 'Justin Stockdale'; 'Matthew >> Cotton'; 'Pete Pasterz'; RicAnthony@no.address; >> stevew@no.address; gary@no.address; >> crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address; >> marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; >> stephanie@no.address; 'Anna Cummins'; 'Brenda Platt'; 'Debra >> Hagstrom'; 'Jonathan Parfrey'; nseldman@no.address; 'Raymond Halowski'; >> 'Steve Mosko'; 'Stuart Moody' >> Subject: RE: [CRRA] Plastics in the ocean >> >> This seemed topical to the discussion... >> >> http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1106-01.htm >> >> >> Tedd Ward, M.S. - Program Manager >> Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority 1700 State Street Crescent >> City, CA 95531 >> >> (707) 465-1100 >> >> "My life is garbage, but I'm in recovery." >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: crra_members@no.address >> [mailto:crra_members@no.address] >> On >> Behalf Of Dan Knapp >> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 2:19 PM >> To: michael@no.address >> Cc: stephanie.barger@no.address; 'Justin Stockdale'; 'Matthew >> Cotton'; 'Pete Pasterz'; RicAnthony@no.address; >> stevew@no.address; gary@no.address; >> crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address; >> marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; >> stephanie@no.address; 'Anna Cummins'; 'Brenda Platt'; 'Debra >> Hagstrom'; 'Jonathan Parfrey'; nseldman@no.address; 'Raymond Halowski'; >> 'Steve Mosko'; 'Stuart Moody' >> Subject: Re: [CRRA] RE: [GreenYes] Can you feed the stuff to the >> fish? >> >> To Michael, et. al. >> >> Thanks for the report on plastic bottled water. >> >> Many of my employees buy the stuff, so last year I read to them a >> message to all municipal water supply users from East Bay Municipal >> Utility District showing that our water was super clean and high >> quality, coming straight from a protected watershed on the Tuoloumne >> River in the Sierra Nevada. Some reacted with skepticism. I said I >> always drink water from our taps, never from the bottled supply that >> these folks insist is healthier. As we discussed this further, I was >> amazed to find that one of our most enlightened managers thought our >> tapwater was somehow contaminated by the fact of its having passed >> through metal pipes in our 70-year-old industrial building! This >> speaks to the "fears" that you mentioned. More sinister to me is the >> corporate drive to privatize the water supply, often by saying >> private >> companies can deliver a superior product or do it cheaper or both. >> One of Enron's schemes under Skilling was to create an international >> water supply company, after which they started buying up various >> water >> suppliers around the world using money leveraged from their eager >> lenders. It didn't work out well for them, fortunately, but I doubt >> backers of this scheme are discouraged. I view this as one more way >> to enclose the commons for private profit. >> All those ad slogans about superior water in plastic bottles play >> directly into this monopolistic desire by publicly traded >> companies to >> turn a profit on every single bodily or mental function we have. >> Water supplies should be publicly owned and managed for public >> benefit! >> >> Dan Knapp >> Urban Ore, Inc. >> Berkeley, CA >> On Nov 3, 2006, at 11:42 AM, J. Michael Huls wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Most of what is purchased as bottled water is actually from the tap. >>> It is purified water from municipal water supplies. One of my >>> favorite stories was in Houston, Texas, where you can buy bottled >>> water "from the Ozark Mountains (Ozarka)." However, when you read >>> the fine print on the label, it states "from Harris County Municipal >>> Water Supply" which is the County in which Houston is located. So, >>> most people who buy such water are actually paying double or triple >>> what they already have in their home. It has always been a scam for >>> companies to prey on the fears of people that they are being >>> poisoned >>> by tap water. In some cases, this might have been true (water >>> contaminated at Love Canal, PG&E, etc.). >>> >>> Where water is drawn from mountain sources, I agree that >>> Stephanie is >>> right on target, as it draws water away from more important uses. >>> >>> Furthermore, plastic bottles are not necessarily "safe." When I was >>> taking samples for US EPA of hazardous waste sites, we could not use >>> any plastic containers but only glass containers (this is a sampling >>> requirement). When water is left in plastic containers, it is a >>> wonderful solvent, and strips out various contaminants such as MEK >>> and other pasticizers in the plastic bottle wall; especially when >>> such bottles are lift out in the sun and get irradiated and >>> heated to >>> near boiling temperature. I actualy did an experiment and conducted >>> full laboratory analyses on pure distilled water samples in plastic >>> containers. The lab report on the distilled water came back with >>> the >>> water contaminated with MEK and some other nasties as if it was >>> hazardous. >>> >>> >>> J. Michael Huls, REA >>> >>> Huls Environmental Management, LLC >>> 1074 Parkview Drive, Suite 105 >>> Covina, CA 91724 >>> (626) 332-7514 ofc >>> (626) 332-7504 fax >>> www.hulsenv.com <http://www.hulsenv.com> >>> >>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may also >>> contain privileged consultant-client information or work product. >>> The information is intended only for the use of the individual >>> entity >>> to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended receipient, or >>> the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended >>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, >>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly >>> prohibited. >>> If you have received the email in error, please immediately >>> notify us >>> by telephone and/or return the message to us at the email address >>> above. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: crra_members@no.address >>> [mailto:crra_members@no.address] On Behalf Of Stephanie Barger >>> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:36 AM >>> To: 'Justin Stockdale'; 'Matthew Cotton'; 'Pete Pasterz' >>> Cc: RicAnthony@no.address; stevew@no.address; >>> gary@no.address; >>> crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >>> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >>> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address; >>> marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; >>> stephanie@no.address; Anna Cummins; Brenda Platt; Debra >>> Hagstrom; Jonathan Parfrey; nseldman@no.address; Raymond Halowski; >>> Steve Mosko; Stuart Moody >>> Subject: [CRRA] RE: [GreenYes] Can you feed the stuff to the fish? >>> >>> Hi Everyone >>> >>> I have not jumped in before as I have enjoyed how educated and aware >>> people are becoming of the many challenges surrounding bioplastics. >>> They are a great "Alternative" but not a solution. >>> >>> Zero Waste - I do not want to speak for all the Zero Wasters but our >>> Zero Waste policy does not promote any product that causes more >>> consumption and >>> disposable items. We are about "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle". Our >>> biggest >>> challenge is to get away from the need for instant convenience >>> and we >>> continually promote reusable everything and more important regarding >>> bottled water the following are high priorities >>> >>> Bottled Water >>> >>> 1) We are stripping our natural springs where life begins >>> 2) We should be pushing for clean and safe water directly from the >>> tap >>> 3) Water bottles allow a HUGE amount waste of water. We stopped >>> using bottled water at any of our beach cleanups because we would >>> find over 50% of the water was left in bottles (let alone the >>> pollution of the >>> bottles) >>> 4) The amount of energy required for shipping any type of bottled >>> water from the mountains to our local grocery stores or across the >>> pacific from FIJI >>> 5) It is a huge financial strain on low-income families and most of >>> them to do even realize the amount they are spending. This is a >>> great environmental "Math" problem that our 3rd and 4th graders >>> solve >>> and they see the value of instead of bottled water they could have a >>> new bike, a vacation, etc. >>> >>> Zero Waste is about looking at ALL the inputs and outputs and I do >>> not see how bottled water fits into any of our policies. I would >>> like to see a campaign that would ask people, etc to reduce the >>> amount of bottled water we consume whether it be in bioplastics vs. >>> petroplastics. >>> >>> Please attend our conference on November 15th to learn more about >>> zero waste http://www.earthresource.org/zerowaste.html >>> >>> Stephanie Barger, Executive Director >>> stephanie.barger@no.address >>> Earth Resource Foundation >>> 230 E. 17th St #208 >>> Costa Mesa, CA 92627 >>> www.earthresource.org <http://www.earthresource.org/> >>> 949-645-5163 >>> >>> Help support Earth Resource Foundation's youth programs and >>> campaigns >>> for: >>> smoke free beaches, plastic reduction and promotion of electric cars >>> and renewable energies >>> >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> From: Justin Stockdale [mailto:jstockdale@no.address] >>> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:00 AM >>> To: 'Matthew Cotton'; 'Pete Pasterz' >>> Cc: RicAnthony@no.address; stevew@no.address; >>> gary@no.address; >>> crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >>> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >>> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address; >>> marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; >>> stephanie@no.address >>> Subject: RE: [GreenYes] Can you feed the stuff to the fish? >>> >>> >>> >>> I feel like I am missing something in the ongoing debate about the >>> virtues of PLA and other bio-plastics.is no one concerned that these >>> plastics stand to sanctify the production of gmo's as >>> environmentally >>> preferable simply because they fit nicely into the zero waste >>> framework? To read recently that the Boulder farmers market is not >>> only proud, but touting their zero waste status though the use of >>> gmo >>> products seems to me to be as contrary to the virtues of a farmers >>> market as possible. >>> >>> I am struck that the zero waste movement is getting lost striving >>> for >>> the magic zero.that they have divorced their movement from all other >>> aspects of environmental responsibility? Just because it is >>> compostable does not make a starlink knife a good thing. >>> >>> >>> >>> And please do not forget that recycling, composting and the lot is >>> still waste, if you have it to be recycled you have still generated >>> waste.... >>> >>> >>> >>> Justin Stockdale >>> >>> Buckman Road Recycling & Transfer Station >>> >>> 149 Wildlife Way >>> >>> Santa Fe, NM 87506 >>> >>> 505-424-1850 >>> >>> jstockdale@no.address >>> >>> Save your local landfill...Recycle >>> >>> >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> From: GreenYes@no.address [mailto:GreenYes@no.address] >>> On Behalf >>> Of Matthew Cotton >>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:06 PM >>> To: Pete Pasterz >>> Cc: RicAnthony@no.address; stevew@no.address; >>> gary@no.address; >>> crra_members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >>> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >>> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address; >>> marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; mgordon@no.address; >>> stephanie@no.address >>> Subject: [GreenYes] Can you feed the stuff to the fish? >>> >>> >>> >>> Rick (et al) - >>> >>> >>> >>> I agree that the introduction of biodegradable "stuff" brings up >>> issues, both new and existing. I guess the question is: Does the >>> introduction of PLA (or other compostable stuff) necessarily lead to >>> more litter or more plastic in the environment? We have a massive >>> litter problem now, but I don't see how the introduction of >>> compostable stuff increases this problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, we have a lot of education to do. I just had a quick lunch >>> of an >>> Annie Chun "instant" noodle bowl. It came in a "biodegradable" >>> container, which is cool. But there is no information on the package >>> or on their website about what to do with this. Should I put it >>> in my >>> home composting bin? >>> (probably). >>> Should I try to get it to a composting facility that takes food >>> scraps and biod egradable stuff? How is a consumer supposed to know >>> what to do with it? >>> Is this just furthering the myth that eventually all things will >>> decompose in the landfill? >>> >>> >>> >>> As you know, I was on the panel at NRC that discussed some of these >>> issues. >>> I wish I had had a chance to bring up the concept of MOOP (Matter >>> Out >>> of Place). Probably a good concept to think about. Along the road to >>> zero waste we've got to focus on the MOOP. All of the plastic in the >>> environment is MOOP. The way to fix this is to provide the education >>> and the infrastructure to get the Matter into the right place (as >>> for >>> example, Eco-Cycle is doing with their Center for Hard to Recycle >>> Materials, why aren't there more of these?). >>> >>> >>> >>> Replacing some or all of the food service containers and utensils >>> with a biodegradable alternative may ensure that at least some of it >>> gets recovered via composting. I ag ree wholeheartedly with >>> Stephen's point that it would seem that most non-bottle plastics >>> (and >>> I think nationally we're recycling about 25% of those?), in most >>> places, don't get recycled, so either end up in a landfill, in an >>> incinerator, or in the environment. So to the extent that we can >>> replace these non-recyclable items with compostable ones, we can >>> hope >>> to recover at least some of them and hopefully recover some of the >>> wasted food that is also landfilled along with them. >>> >>> >>> >>> Matthew Cotton >>> >>> Integrated Waste Management Consulting, LLC >>> >>> 19375 Lake City Road >>> >>> Nevada City, CA 95959 >>> >>> 530-265-4560 >>> >>> mattcotton@no.address >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Pete Pasterz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Especially after the NRC presentation during which the NatureWorks >>> rep. >>> stated that PLA will NOT decompose as litter on the roadside or in >>> water; only in a compost pile of 150 degrees! >>> >>> >>> >>> Pete Pasterz >>> >>> >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> From: GreenYes@no.address [mailto:GreenYes@no.address] >>> On Behalf >>> Of RicAnthony@no.address >>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:12 PM >>> To: stevew@no.address; gary@no.address; crra >>> _members@no.address; GreenYes@no.address; >>> zwia@no.address; ZERI_Practitioners@no.address; >>> ZERI-US@no.address; sustainablebusiness@no.address >>> Cc: marc.gunther@no.address; cmoore@no.address; >>> mgordon@no.address; stephanie@no.address >>> Subject: [heur] [GreenYes] Can you feed the stuff to the fish? >>> Importance: Low >>> >>> In a message dated 11/2/2006 12:06:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, >>> stevew@no.address writes:think bio-plastic bottles are a >>> great idea except the "recycling problem" is definitely a >>> concern.....shoul d definitely support other bio-plastic products >>> such as cups, and foodservice containers. >>> >>> >>> >>> I worry about all the food service containers and utensils that are >>> dumped into the environment becoming fish and bird food before >>> totally decomposed. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]