[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
At 03:50 PM 2/12/2008 -0600, Reindl, John wrote: >Allan ~ > >I think that we need some hard data before we start passing judgement. > >John Well, I think we need a lot more data before passing any judgements in favor....in my view, the presumption is overwhelmingly against. Alan >-----Original Message----- >From: Alan Muller [mailto:amuller@no.address] >Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:39 PM >To: Reindl, John; Eric Lombardi; Helen Spiegelman; GreenYes >Subject: Re: [GreenYes] Re: EU conclusion on bioreactors > >Folks, > >If the only data point we had was the WMI wanted >something, that would be enough to label it as bad idea. > >But if that isn't enough, just look at the >actual recovery (percentage) of gases from dumps >even under favorable circumstances. > >I haven't seen any data, but would think that >recirculating the leachate would increase the >levels of toxins in landfill gas as well as the >release of gaseous toxins into the ambient >air. I would also think this would increase the >"strength" of the leachate, which would probably >accelerate degradation of rubber/plastic liners. > >An all-around horrible idea. > >am > >At 02:31 PM 2/12/2008 -0600, Reindl, John wrote: >>Eric, >> >>You made the statement: >> >> Never mind that Europe looked at bioreactors >> long ago and rejected them in any and all >> forms as unsafe and unable to keep pollution from the environment. >> >> >>When I served on a committee on the future of >>materials management, I did a lot of reading of >>government and research organization documents >>and never found such a statement. I had hoped >>that you could provide such a document. >> >>John >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Eric Lombardi [ mailto:eric@no.address] >>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:20 PM >>To: Reindl, John; 'Helen Spiegelman'; 'GreenYes' >>Subject: RE: [GreenYes] Re: EU conclusion on bioreactors >> >>John, >> >>My comment comes not from a source document, >>but from my personal work experiences with >>European waste experts over the last ten >>years. I have had the good fortune to work >>with some incredible people across the ocean, >>and some of them may be on this list (or >>lurking). I remember discussing the >>bioreactor situation with them almost five >>years ago and they thought it was funny how one >>large private corporation (Waste Management >>Inc) was going to take America down a path that >>the EU had already decided wasn?t a good choice. >> >>And I?m not sure you?re right that the EU >>Directive came before bioreactors, although I >>don?t have the documents to back me up. Do >>you? And I agree with Helen? the EU is >>aggresively shutting down the landfill as an >>option over the next 10 years and the way they >>are doing it is to LIMIT (and nearly prohibit) >>the amount of biodegradable material allowed to >>go in. Hmmm? I wonder why that was their chosen strategy? >> >>Eric >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: GreenYes@no.address [ >>mailto:GreenYes@no.address] On Behalf Of Reindl, John >>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:08 AM >>To: Helen Spiegelman; GreenYes >>Subject: [GreenYes] Re: EU conclusion on bioreactors >> >>Hi Helen ~ >> >>My sense is that the EU Directive was >>promulgated before the concept of bioreactors was fully developed. >> >>It seems to me not a rejection, per se, but >>selection of a different path, when fewer pathes were available. >> >>And, the EU still allows organics in landfills, >>thus those landfills still have the long term >>issues related to organics to deal with. >> >>John >>-----Original Message----- >>From: GreenYes@no.address [ >>mailto:GreenYes@no.address]On Behalf Of Helen Spiegelman >>Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 5:00 PM >>To: GreenYes >>Subject: [GreenYes] Re: EU conclusion on bioreactors >>Interesting question raised here: since the EU >>Directive set limits on the % of organics in >>landfills doesn't this amount to a de-facto rejection of bioreactor landfills? >>H. >>At 02:14 PM 2/11/2008, Reindl, John wrote: >> >>Hi Eric ~ >> >>Could you provide an official EU or other >>European agency document that shows that they >>have examined and rejected bioreactors "in any >>and all forms and as unsafe and unable to keep >>pollution from the environment"? >> >>I served on a committee that looked at >>accelerating the time frame at which waste >>disposal sites would degrade material in them >>and looked at what was going on in the EU, but >>was not fortunate enough to come up with any >>references that included that conclusion. >> >>Thanks much, >> >>John >>-----Original Message----- >>From: GreenYes@no.address [ >>mailto:GreenYes@no.address]On Behalf Of Eric Lombardi >>Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:02 PM >>To: pdunn@no.address; 'GreenYes' >>Subject: [GreenYes] Re: Michigan bill could >>repeal landfill ban on yard waste >> Never mind that Europe looked at bioreactors >> long ago and rejected them in any and all >> forms as unsafe and unable to keep pollution from the environment. >>Eric >> >> >><BR |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]