[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
> ------ Forwarded Message > From: Newsdesk <newsdesk@no.address> > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:43:13 -0600 > To: David Biddle <dbiddle@no.address> > Subject: Check out this article from Crosslands > > June 19, 2006 > Master and Commander Charts Climate Course Expectations of the Bush White > House are that with the US at the helm, the big powers will be ready to call > the shots. > > CEQ chairman James Connaughton pictured at a workshop during the 2004 annual > conference held by the National Association of Counties. Photo by David > Hathcox Speaking last month at the American Enterprise Institute, the > libertarian business incubator of conservative political ideas, James > Connaughton delivered a full-length, director?s cut of US policy on global > warming. The former corporate attorney who captains the White House Council > on Environmental Quality led the audience through every global warming port > of call since George W. Bush became president. > > The revealing talk <http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/rm/2006/67433.htm> > explains the strategy behind many of the administration?s moves over the past > year from the G8 meeting in Gleneagles, Scotland, through the international > climate change negotiations in Montreal, up to the publication of the final, > revised carbon dioxide emissions accounting rules in the US (see below). The > main objective has been to place a dozen or two countries, at the most, with > the largest economies on a parallel course to lower greenhouse gas emissions > relative to each dollar of gross national product. By that measure, the US is > already doing quite well. > > Today's approach echoes the no-regrets policy introduced into the climate > change political vernacular by George W. Bush's dad. The idea in 1990 was to > claim credit for modest energy conservation measures that were destined to > happen anyway as a consequence of industrial modernization and cost-cutting. > Meanwhile, carbon emissions rose steadily. > > ?So a good thing about the intensity metric, it rewards economically valuable > activity that does not require a lot of energy or greenhouse gases. So in > America, we are enjoying a huge growth in the service-based sectors, which > consume less energy per unit of economic output,? Connaughton confided. > > The line of thought leads directly to the US Department of Energy?s new > 1605(b) guidelines for voluntary reporting of emissions intensity and > reductions relative to economic output. Environmental groups briefed by DOE > last month are less than enthusiastic about the accounting rules. The data > wi! ll not b e suitable for any future CO2 cap-and-trade program no matter > how more dependable they are compared with the old 1605(b) reports. > > Connaughton said that the action plan agreed to by the G8 at the meeting > hosted by UK Prime Minister Tony Blair last year was a watershed in the > debate. It makes greenhouse gas emissions reductions a stepchild of the > larger international discussion that nations really care about ? economic > growth. The strategic focus permanently shifts influence from climate > specialists to the affairs of state departments and finance advisers. > Environment ministers, especially those from the bulk of the 189 nations that > are parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, are purposefully > demobilized. The White House did its part by pushing the chief US > environmental official out of the picture from the beginning of the Bush > administration. > > ?So again, I want to sort of just continue to underline this point,? > Connaughton said. ?There are big policy drivers out there that are > complimentary to a climate strategy. And if we can focus on all of them in a > bundle, we can make some pretty substantial progress and commitments and > policy initiatives.? > > Connaughton referenced his visit with senior officials in China. ?It was very > clear where these issues ranked in terms of where their focus is. And if they > are focused on economic growth, if they are focused on national security > related to their energy use, well, if you start talking to them on those > terms, the door opens wide. If you start talking to them in terms of a sort a > CO2 lead vision, to that lens and carbon constraints, they tend to push you > off to official number 185.? > > For more information see Gleneagles Gives U.S. Breathing Space on Climate > Change > <http://www.crosslandsbulletin.com/bulletin/stories.php?id=1013&show=bulletini > ndex> , 8 July 2005; Time for Climate Celebrat! ion To T urn Sober > <http://www.crosslandsbulletin.com/bulletin/stories.php?id=1133&show=bulletini > ndex> , 10 December 2005; and Greenhouse Gas Reporting Guidelines Revised > <http://www.crosslandsbulletin.com/bulletin/stories.php?id=1224&show=bulletini > ndex> , 17 April 2006. > > Close Window <javascript:window.close();> > > Visit www.crosslandsbulletin.com </index.php> © Victor House News, > Co. > ------ End of Forwarded Message --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]