[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Zero tolerance for waste policy 17 April 2006 - HUGH BOWRING/UK Anti-incinerator campaigners today hailed zero waste centres as the best solution to the county's rubbish crisis - just as a charity tries to create one to serve parts of Norfolk. Every county in the country is facing crippling penalties for overuse of landfill sites from 2010 and is looking for alternatives. Norfolk County Council has controversially decided that the best option is to burn refuse in a £90 million mass burn incinerator proposed for the Longwater Industrial Estate in Costessey. However, in Suffolk a team of innovative environmentalists are focusing on recycling and reusing everything through the creation of a zero waste centre and generating more than 100 jobs in the process. The centres - which are also known as resource recovery parks - are big news in other parts of the world but are yet to make their mark in Britain. Last May charity Suffolk Connect was awarded £117,500 from Defra, the Environment Agency and the East of England Development Agency to carry out a study for such a park in the Waveney and Great Yarmouth area. Maxine Narburgh, who is heading the project, said the centre would be capable of dealing with 100,000 tonnes worth of residual rubbish a year and would employ around 125 people. It would be designed to recycle and reuse a dozen types of waste and discarded materials, with processed products becoming available for immediate resale in their current state or for use in manufacturing. "Every product can be broken down into one of these categories - we haven't found anything that can't. It's all about applying the right technology to the appropriate resource stream so your end result is a product and resource of value. "On top of that there is no pollution to the water, to the soil or to the air. It just makes sense." Suffolk Connect estimates the capital cost of setting up the park would be £7.1 million (not including land) and a further £1.6 million annually to run it. The revenue generated from sale of materials and gate fees would be in the region of £3.4 million a year. One of the main challenges of running a successful park is encouraging people to separate their rubbish at source to help the end of line separation process. "If it all comes in mixed up as it does to landfill then it won't be a very viable or pleasant job to sort out," said Ms Narburgh, who is hoping construction work will begin this year once a site, either in the Yarmouth or Lowestoft areas, has been secured. She said a successful zero waste scheme also relied on the Government increasing producer responsibility: "Everybody needs to get involved to make this a success, but it is worth it." How it would work: Household and trade waste that has not been separated out for recycling will be trucked to the centre. This would then be separated either automatically or manually into one of 12 different categories of materials. These are: paper, polymers (such as plastics, rubbers, etc), metals, chemicals, textiles, soils, ceramics, green waste, putrescibles (for example food waste, animal slurry), wood and glass. These products are grouped into five clusters covering organic, regulated materials and chemicals, reusables, recyclables and construction materials. Clean organic matter is treated through an onsite system called anaerobic digestion. Whatever can be reused or recycled is sold off accordingly and all other materials are treated on site using a raft of different processes and technologies and then used in manufacturing and other areas. The planning process for the incinerator: Early 2006 - Scoping stage. Waste Recycling Group (WRG) to agree which issues should be considered in the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA). Includes public input. Spring - Environmental Impact Assessment. Technical assessment of impacts of the development proposed. Spring/summer - WRG to consider outcomes of EIA and get further input from local people before finalising the proposals. Summer - WRG to submit planning application to Norfolk County Council and an Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) permit application to the Environment Agency Summer/Autumn - Formal consultation by Norfolk County Council on the planning application. Winter - Further information and clarification from WRG if requested by Norfolk County Council. Winter 2006/ spring 2007 - Planning officers will give a report to the council's planning committee. The committee will decide on whether or not to grant planning permission or not. What do you think of the plans for an incinerator in Costessey? Write to Evening News Letters, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich, NR1 1RE, email eveningnewsletters@no.address or visit www.eveningnews24.co.uk/forums 17 April 2006 - HUGH BOWRING Anti-incinerator campaigners today hailed zero waste centres as the best solution to the county's rubbish crisis - just as a charity tries to create one to serve parts of Norfolk. Every county in the country is facing crippling penalties for overuse of landfill sites from 2010 and is looking for alternatives. Norfolk County Council has controversially decided that the best option is to burn refuse in a £90 million mass burn incinerator proposed for the Longwater Industrial Estate in Costessey. However, in Suffolk a team of innovative environmentalists are focusing on recycling and reusing everything through the creation of a zero waste centre and generating more than 100 jobs in the process. The centres - which are also known as resource recovery parks - are big news in other parts of the world but are yet to make their mark in Britain. Last May charity Suffolk Connect was awarded £117,500 from Defra, the Environment Agency and the East of England Development Agency to carry out a study for such a park in the Waveney and Great Yarmouth area. Maxine Narburgh, who is heading the project, said the centre would be capable of dealing with 100,000 tonnes worth of residual rubbish a year and would employ around 125 people. It would be designed to recycle and reuse a dozen types of waste and discarded materials, with processed products becoming available for immediate resale in their current state or for use in manufacturing. "Every product can be broken down into one of these categories - we haven't found anything that can't. It's all about applying the right technology to the appropriate resource stream so your end result is a product and resource of value. "On top of that there is no pollution to the water, to the soil or to the air. It just makes sense." Suffolk Connect estimates the capital cost of setting up the park would be £7.1 million (not including land) and a further £1.6 million annually to run it. The revenue generated from sale of materials and gate fees would be in the region of £3.4 million a year. One of the main challenges of running a successful park is encouraging people to separate their rubbish at source to help the end of line separation process. "If it all comes in mixed up as it does to landfill then it won't be a very viable or pleasant job to sort out," said Ms Narburgh, who is hoping construction work will begin this year once a site, either in the Yarmouth or Lowestoft areas, has been secured. She said a successful zero waste scheme also relied on the Government increasing producer responsibility: "Everybody needs to get involved to make this a success, but it is worth it." How it would work: Household and trade waste that has not been separated out for recycling will be trucked to the centre. This would then be separated either automatically or manually into one of 12 different categories of materials. These are: paper, polymers (such as plastics, rubbers, etc), metals, chemicals, textiles, soils, ceramics, green waste, putrescibles (for example food waste, animal slurry), wood and glass. These products are grouped into five clusters covering organic, regulated materials and chemicals, reusables, recyclables and construction materials. Clean organic matter is treated through an onsite system called anaerobic digestion. Whatever can be reused or recycled is sold off accordingly and all other materials are treated on site using a raft of different processes and technologies and then used in manufacturing and other areas. The planning process for the incinerator: Early 2006 - Scoping stage. Waste Recycling Group (WRG) to agree which issues should be considered in the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA). Includes public input. Spring - Environmental Impact Assessment. Technical assessment of impacts of the development proposed. Spring/summer - WRG to consider outcomes of EIA and get further input from local people before finalising the proposals. Summer - WRG to submit planning application to Norfolk County Council and an Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) permit application to the Environment Agency Summer/Autumn - Formal consultation by Norfolk County Council on the planning application. Winter - Further information and clarification from WRG if requested by Norfolk County Council. Winter 2006/ spring 2007 - Planning officers will give a report to the council's planning committee. The committee will decide on whether or not to grant planning permission or not. What do you think of the plans for an incinerator in Costessey? Write to Evening News Letters, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich, NR1 1RE, email eveningnewsletters@no.address or visit _www.eveningnews24.co.uk/forums_ (http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/forums) _Ricanthony@no.address (mailto:Ricanthony@no.address) RichardAnthonyAssociates.com San Diego, California --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]