[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
From: Robin Ingenthron [mailto:robin@no.address] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:40 PM To: 'greenyes-digest-help@no.address' Subject: RE: Inkjet Cartridge Destruction - Enforced Obsolescence Inkjet Cartridge Discussion http://att.com.com/2100-1001_3-949914.html I visited one of the neighborhoods where hundreds of Chinese cartridge refurbishers were arrested and accused of "counterfeiting" following a $6M payment from a major brand manufacturer to the Chinese EPA. http://www.laserpage.com/recycling-fraud.htm The refilled cartridges were, I was told, burned in the street BY THE OFFICIALS as an "anti-counterfeit" measure (see industry mag photo above which actually implies it was the recyclers burning the catridges). I don't know which is correct. This is just to note that the ISSUE is not recycling at all, it is that major printer manufacturers followed a "Gilette strategy" (don't make money on the razor, you make your money on the blades) and gave away their printers for several years hoping to make money on $40 refill cartridges. http://www.interex.org/hpworldnews/hpw205/pub_hpw_news1.jsp The free market in China and Malaysia (and now other places including Viet Nam) responded by refurbishing the cartridges and reselling them. The "gray market" is so called because some of the activity is black market (like is alleged to be in the article above) while other is simply secondary market. Again, in Ninhai, everyone was arrested, every cartridge was burned, and if it had a brand on it (the all do) it was considered "counterfeiting" that brand to refill it. |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]