[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] new CDC Report on Toxics in our bodies
- Subject: [GreenYes] new CDC Report on Toxics in our bodies
- From: Ted Smith <tsmith@svtc.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:53:43 -0800
http://www.toxicexposure.org/index.cfm?C=2&CFID=6502&CFTOKEN=59983641
The CDC National Chemical Exposure
Report
Profiles of the Chemicals Found in our
[toxicexposure.org]
Bodies
Reducing Your Toxic Exposure
Coalition Statement
Press Room
User Controls
[Image]
[Image]
[Image] 1. Write 2.
Invite 3.
[Image]
Volunteer
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Welcome to ToxicExposure.org!
Statement
of
Protect your family's health from
Health, Education, Religious,
Women's, exposure to
toxic chemicals! Please
Children's, and Environmental
Organizations send a free
e-postcard today.
In Response
to
Take action to protect your family's
The
Nation's First
Chemical
health...
Exposure Monitoring
Report
Dear Appropriations Committee
Leaders:
As organizations concerned with the nation's
health, the education and development of
our Toxic chemicals contribute
to a
children, and our moral responsibility
to range of
chronic diseases such
current and future generations, we
welcome as cancers,
birth defects,
the nation's first-ever report of
chemical
Parkinson's disease, and
contaminants in the bodies of
average
developmental and neurological
Americans.
disabilities. We know more about
the chemical contaminants in the
The results released today by the Centers
for fish that swim in our lakes
and
Disease Control and Prevention represent
the streams than we do about
the
nation's first step toward understanding
the chemicals inside our
nation's
role that an array of chemical
contaminants children.
The research on the
play in contributing to chronic diseases
such toxic chemicals inside our
as certain cancers, birth defects,
mental bodies
should be greatly
disabilities, and developmental
and
expanded. I call on you to
neurological effects in
children.
immediately double funding for
the Center for Disease Control's
The results raise serious concerns that
need modest exposure
monitoring
to be addressed. Among
them:
program and to consider this as
a down payment on a
* Since a majority of individuals in
this comprehensive national
exposure
study had detectable levels of
chemical monitoring
program.
contaminants in their bodies, it
is
reasonable to assume that a majority
of Add your
message in the box
Americans carry within them
a
below.
multiplicity of substances of
varying
toxicity that they are exposed to
daily
or that accumulate in their bodies
over First Name[Image]Last
Name[Image]
time;
* Actual mercury levels are higher
than
E-mail Address
scientific models and bodies like
the
National Academy of Sciences
have
Street Address
estimated. Levels of mercury among
many
women of childbearing age are
high
enough such that small increases
in
City[Image]State[Image]Zip
exposure could expose them and
children
in utero to unsafe levels. The
findings Keep
me informed about this
suggest that more than 60,000
children
are probably born each year with
unsafe issue.
levels of
mercury.
I prefer e-mail as web pages.
Security Settings
* Pesticide levels for a small portion
of
[Image]
those tested were much higher than
had
Which should I choose?
been predicted. If these findings
were
found to hold true for the
general
Personal Computer
population, many Americans could
be
Shared Computer
exposed to pesticide levels much
higher
[Image]
than was previously believed.
[Image]
* Individuals are exposed to phthalates
on
Privacy Policy
a frequent if not daily basis, and
at
much higher levels than
scientific
models and a major government panel
had
predicted just six months ago. Women
of
childbearing age, in particular,
are
regularly exposed to a phthalate
clearly
associated with developmental
effects in
animal studies.
* No one can say with certainty whether
the levels of chemicals found by the
CDC
are safe-even for those substances
that
appear to fall within legal
exposure
levels. Legal levels were never set
to
take into account the additive
effects
of chemicals acting in combination
with
one another or to take into account
the
much greater vulnerability of
children
and other sub-populations.
* The population-wide reductions in
childhood lead poisoning document
the
continuing health benefits of
government
regulations to control lead.
Nevertheless, this aggregate
national
data do not capture the
continuing
tragedy of childhood lead
poisoning.
More than one-third of
preschool
children in many low-income
minority
communities are still poisoned by
lead
paint hazards in their homes.
The
national lead data released by the
CDC
today underlines the need for much
more
localized data in the future.
* For almost every class of chemical, the
CDC report demonstrates that
scientific
models and expert panels have
generally
underestimated the public's real
world
exposure to toxic chemicals.
Because of government funding priorities, we
know more about the chemical contaminants in
the fish that swim in our lakes and streams
than we do about the chemicals inside our
children. Much more information is needed
about chemical contaminants in humans in
order to protect public health and because
Americans have a fundamental right to know
about the chemicals contaminants that might
be in their bodies. Based on this:
1. We are calling on Congress to
immediately double the CDC's
modest
budget for exposure monitoring and
to
ramp up in five years to a
comprehensive
national exposure monitoring
program
that targets every state, every
major
subpopulation in the U.S., and more
than
500 toxic substances including all
major
pesticides and all chemicals found
in
public water systems. A
comprehensive
national exposure monitoring
system
together with disease incidence
data
will allow health officials to
determine
which chemicals pose health dangers
to
the public.
2. We are calling on manufacturers and the
U.S. government to act with
more
precaution: to ensure that all
chemicals
to which people are exposed are
fully
tested, especially for potential
effects
on children, and that more
aggressive
steps are taken to reduce exposure
to
substances that are harmful or
potentially harmful, following
the
examples of lead and cotinine.
Nearly
90% of the top-volume chemicals
in
commerce lack basic, publicly
available
screening information about hazards
to
health.
3. In the absence of easily accessible
health and toxicity information from
the
U.S. government on the
chemicals
identified in this exposure report,
we
are committed to making sure the
public
is aware of information they have
a
right to know. The web site,
http://www.toxicexposure.org,
will
provide basic information about
the
sources of toxic substances
identified
in Americans' bodies by the CDC,
the
effects of such chemicals observed
in
scientific studies, and steps
individuals can take to limit
their
exposure if they choose.
Coalition Signatories:
Alliance To End Childhood Lead
Poisoning
American College of Preventive
Medicine
American Federation of
Teachers
American Public Health
Association
Association of Women's Health,
Obstetric
and Neonatal
Nurses
Breast Cancer Fund
Central Conference of American
Rabbis
Children's Environmental
Health
Network
Environmental Working Group
Health Care Without Harm
Learning Disabilities Association
of
America
National Council of Catholic
Women
National Education Association
National Environmental Trust
National Medical Association
National Safety Council
Physicians for Social
Responsibility
Union of American Hebrew
Congregations
US Public Interest Research
Group
YWCA of America
[Image]
Design and ColdFusion by Dungeness Communications
& Design
Ted Smith
Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition
Campaign for Responsible Technology
760 N. First Street
San Jose, CA 95112
408-287-6707-phone
408-287-6771-fax
tsmith@igc.org
=========================================
Food for thought:
How Gandhi Defined the Seven Deadly Sins
· Wealth without work
· Pleasure without conscience
· Knowledge without character
· Commerce without morality
· Science without humanity
· Worship without sacrifice
· Politics without principle
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]