[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Hello M.S. I agree. However, the economic system is distorted because it excludes the environmental costs of manufacturing to a large degree. The cost of using up the world's petroleum, of causing the extinction of species, of degrading water and air quality, etc. is mostly externalized. If the 'true costs' were included in manufacturing "stuff", then the value of the stuff would be much higher, and we would not be so apt to make it and discard it. We would instead: -rethink it, -reuse it, -repair it, and -recycle it, Instead of -landfilling it, or -incinerating/capturing raw material energy from it. The best way to reduce waste is to ensure that the true economic and ecological value of the item is included in its price. Or as the late Governor/Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin said, "the economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the ecology." But unfortunately, the econmists don't act that way. Norm Ruttan iWasteNot Systems www.iwastenotsystems.com Materials Exchange, Recycling Websites & more 1-800-630-7864 |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]