[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Nancy, I think you are looking at the cups the wrong way. In the life cycle of cups, the most damage in terms of use of resources, creation of greenhouse gasses, and waste of energy comes from the manufacturing of cups in the first place, not the disposal or composting of cups at the end of their life. In this, recycling is clearly better than composting - particularly for the biodegradable cups. First regarding biodegradable cups, unfortunately, unlike leaves, grass, weeds, and food waste, biodegradable plastic and paper cups do not break down into natural fertilizers. The biodegradable plastic (PLA or polylactic acid) and PLA-coated paper cups break down almost entirely into carbon dioxide (a greenhouse gas) and water. Leaves, weeds and other natural plant materials have lignins and other complex organic molecules that break down to form the nice brown humus that makes up compost. PLA is a very simple molecule that when it breaks down, goes very quickly all the way to carbon dioxide and water leaving virtually nothing left behind to grow plants in. Paper cups are made with a paper-making process which removes lignins, and so they too break down almost all the way to carbon dioxide and water. For these cups, all of the energy and material that went into making the cups is completely lost - 100% waste. When you recycle cups, it does take some energy, but it takes a lot less energy and material than it does to make cups out of virgin materials. Thus, when you recycle cups, it takes less energy than it does to compost the cups and then have to start out fresh with raw materials to make new cups. Note - this is true even for the biodegradable PLA cups. It would be more efficient and less damaging to the environment if you could recycle the PLA cups instead of composting them. The only problem is the difficulty in collecting and cleaning the cups so that they could be recycled into new cups. In short, this is just a specific example of why our solid waste hierarchy has recycling above composting. In most cases, recycling saves more energy and resources than composting does. Peter Spendelow Oregon Department of Environmental Quality On Mar 31, 7:02 am, "Nancy Poh" <nancy...@no.address> wrote: > I am surprised to hear that because we have supply of Bio-degradable > containers that are convertible into natural fertilizers. Is that not > better than recyclable since there will be no energy wasted to recycle > it? > > Rgds > GreenBeing Nancy > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]