[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Yes, but the award to the Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District was NOT based on the fact that they incinerate sludge in multiple-hearth incinerators. (Typically there is little attention given to the air emissions associated with sewage treatment. And, alas, these facilities aren't covered by the "Toxic Release Inventory" reporting program.) Incineration is generally bad news, and generally the WORST sort of incinerator are these "multiple hearth" units. The reason is (getting technical) that they are "countercurrent" devices, meaning that the feed materials are gradually heated but the resulting off gases never pass through the highest temperature parts of the process along with the solids. So they are usually big polluters unless they have major afterburners and other pollution control equipment. This is no model for what to do, whatever the merits of the rest of the Green Bay operations. Regards, Alan Muller Green Delaware At 08:11 AM 1/5/2007 -0600, Reindl, John wrote: Hi Keith ~ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]