GreenYes Archives

[GreenYes Home] - [Thread Index] - [Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]


[GreenYes] Fw: [epguild] When Kitchen Waste Isn't Wasted- SF Chron]



Subject: [epguild] When Kitchen Waste Isn't Wasted- SF Chron]




URL:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/25/
FOODSCRAPS.TMP
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle

DAVIS
When kitchen waste isn't wasted
Upscale Bay Area restaurants helping feed machine that turns scraps
into electricity, vehicle fuel
-Glen Martin, Chronicle Environment Writer
Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Grass-fed beef, organic vegetables and seafood from sustainable
fisheries have made it possible for Bay Area foodies to make fine
dining an act of social conscience for quite a while.

Now they can feel virtuous about one more thing: the grub they leave on
their plate.

That's because scraps from some of the region's trendiest restaurants
-- Zuni Cafe, Jardiniere, Oliveto and Boulevard, among others -- are
being enlisted in the quest for renewable energy. Eight tons a week of
everything that comes back on plates or is rejected by the kitchen will
be sent to a state-of-the-art digester at UC Davis, where it will be
transformed into valuable "biogas" -- methane and hydrogen -- and
fertilizer.

The digester -- an impressive amalgam of vats, piping, cables,
conveyers and hoppers -- was unveiled Tuesday at a site near the
campus' wastewater treatment plant. The project is a joint venture
between the university and a private Davis firm, Onsite Power Systems
Inc.

The system employs anaerobic bacteria -- microbes that function in
the absence of oxygen -- to break down waste in large tanks, yielding
copious volumes of flammable gas.

Ultimately, the plant will handle 8 tons of garbage a day, said its
designer, Ruihong Zhang, a professor of biological and agricultural
engineering at UC Davis. Each ton of slops will produce enough gas to
supply 10 homes, but for now, enthusiasts primarily see it as a way to
fuel garbage trucks and other commercial vehicles while reducing
landfill volume. The digesting process converts between 60 and 90
percent of organic solids to biogas, Zhang said.

Some Bay Area cities -- including San Francisco -- already send
their food waste to a composting site near Vacaville, where it is
turned into soil amendment. But in a world increasingly stretched for
natural resources and overflowing with garbage, that's not enough, said
Zhang. Her anaerobic digester kicks things up a notch, extracting fuel
as well as fertilizer from kitchen and yard waste.

Digesters have been around in one form or another for several years,
but none has proved commercially feasible. Zhang said her plant is
superior to earlier models because it is far more efficient in terms of
gas production and cost. It's also the first commercial digester that
yields both methane and hydrogen in separate stages, she said.

The two gases can be burned together for either electricity generation
or vehicle fuel. At some future date, Zhang said, the hydrogen will be
separated for use in hydrogen fuel cells -- devices that have yet to
be perfected, but are the holy grail for promoters of green-car
technology.

"Basically we can produce the biogas to many different formulas," said
Zhang. "This is a system that's ready to go. We've been working on it
eight years. The technology has been tested and patented. It can be
scaled up or down depending on need, and it's all based on commercial
components."

Dave Konwinski, the chief executive officer of Onsite Power Systems,
said Zhang's invention will allow waste companies to build digesters to
specifications right at the garbage transfer sites, obviating the time,
fuel and human power now required to lug refuse from cities to
landfills.

Konwinski, whose firm has an exclusive commercial contract for the
digester, said about 20 companies or municipalities already have
expressed interest in buying the devices.

One of them is Waste Systems Inc., which handles garbage for the city
of Industry in Los Angeles County. Jeff Duhamel, Waste Systems'
president, said his company has set aside $400,000 for planning,
permitting and engineering a Zhang digester.

"We're moving ahead with this," he said. "Ultimately, we figure it'll
cost us about $2 million."

And that's a bargain, said Duhamel. Industry relies on the same
landfill -- the nation's largest -- used by the city of Los Angeles.

"The problem is that it'll close in 2013, and at that point we'll have
to send the garbage by truck or train 200 miles east to a new landfill
in the desert," he said. "That will cost us $60 to $80 a ton. We think
this digester will bring our costs down to $30 a ton, when we figure in
the ancillary benefits of using the gas to power our truck fleet."

The praise got a bit fulsome at Tuesday's event -- not just for
Zhang's digester, but for the garbage that charges it.

"Maybe we can now look at America as the Saudi Arabia of waste," said
Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River (Sacramento County). "That can be a
tremendous opportunity for us. I look forward to the day when we don't
look at this as an alternative energy source, but as a conventional
energy source."

Neal Van Alfen, the dean of the UC Davis College of Agricultural and
Environmental Sciences, said the digester takes advantage of a resource
modern society generates in abundance.

"We have to switch from the biomass laid down millions of years ago
(oil, coal and natural gas) to the biomass we're producing today," he
said.

Certainly, the supply of biogas raw material is abundant. The
California Integrated Waste Management Board estimates that 22 million
tons of wet organic waste is produced in the state each year. That
could be used to generate 895,000 kilograms of hydrogen gas a day --
the daily equivalent of 1,363,000 gallons of gasoline.

Some words of caution were raised Tuesday. While hailing Tuesday's
event as "momentous," Val Tiangco, a representative from the California
Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Program, noted the digester
still has to prove it can go from 8 tons a week to the 25 tons a day
required for general commercial feasibility.

And a minor glitch in a demonstration of the digester caused a few
palpitations. When Zhang threw a switch to power a generator to run two
large fans that, in turn, would inflate wildly gyrating green fabric
mannequins, there was a brief hum -- then silence.

No biggie, though -- a defective extension cord was discovered, the
switch was thrown again, and the green figures danced madly in the blue
October sky. The future of anaerobic garbage digestion seemed secure.

And that's a good thing, say supporters, considering the scant
alternatives.

"We've made a lot of progress as a society," said Duhamel, "except when
you look at garbage. For the past 200 years, we've been handling it the
same way -- burn it or bury it. That can't go on. We have to change."

Page B - 1
URL:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/25/
FOODSCRAPS.TMP
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle

Greenaction is an email newsletter centered on the biological and social ecology of the North SF Bay area with reference to the global systems of which we are a part. To subscribe or unsubscribe contact bluespin@no.address





[GreenYes Home] - [Date Index] - [Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]