[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
I still don¹t see an independent analysis, especially with today¹s energy prices. I want to see the capital and operating dollars, Btus in and out, system efficiency analysis, emissions studies, a heat content analysis, the subsidies and any guaranteed pricing, and then the full analysis of recycling, including sensitivity analysis based on participation rates of, say, 40%, 60%, 80% and 90% with a waste composition analysis that is well-defined and fully verifiable, and collection, processing and marketing costs and benefits. If this kind of work isn¹t available, then I don¹t see the point of debating it. Confidentiality statements aside... As always, we shall await the reality of technology implementation. In my 25 years in the field, I have yet to see a $425 million project work the way its investors think it will?for anything. I just hope the folks in St. Lucie County have paid someone a solid chunk of change for serious, smart, and intelligible due diligence. Sorry. -- David Biddle, Executive Director Greater Philadelphia Commercial Recycling Council P.O. Box 4037 Philadelphia, PA 19118 215-247-3090 (desk) 215-432-8225 (cell) <http://www.gpcrc.com> Read In Business magazine to learn about sustainable businesses in communities across North America! Go to: <http://www.jgpress.com/inbusine.htm> on 8/21/06 4:00 PM, David Jaber at djaber@no.address wrote: > In addition to Dave Biddle's excellent comments, from a systems perspective, > since we're all embedded and supported by natural systems, let's look at how > they operate. > > Consider where incinerative processes work, where they don't work, how often > they happen, and what type of fuels they use. It might prove a good guide to > see if, where, and how to incorporate incineration into human processes, and > keep a healthy integration with our communities and world. > > Any ecological biologists or biomicrists, fire away. > > > On Monday, Aug 21, 2006, at 11:43 US/Pacific, Monica Wilson wrote: > >> Apologies that the GreenYes list has been hijacked by this conversation, but >> I'll just share one last thought which is that plasma is clearly incineration >> when the resulting gases are incinerated. This is why the European Union >> considers plasma, gasification and pyrolysis to be incinerators -- combustion >> of waste, even if it's treated first, is incineration: >> The European Union Parliament's Directive on Incineration of Waste: >> http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/pdf/2000/en_2000L0076_do_001.pdf >> "'[I]ncineration plant' means any stationary or mobile technical unit >> andequipment dedicated to the thermal treatment of wastes with or >> withoutrecovery of the combustion heat generated. This includes the >> incineration byoxidation of waste as well as other thermal treatment >> processes such aspyrolysis, gasification or plasma processes in so far as the >> substancesresulting from the treatment are subsequently incinerated." >> >> Not to mention the question of spending over $400 million to destroy valuable >> resources that could be recycled and composted. I suggest we put our money >> and efforts into stopping the twin problems of resource depletion and waste >> creation, rather than subsidizing wasting by finding new ways to juggle mixed >> discards. >> >> I'm happy to continue this discussion with anyone off list to not overwhelm >> the entire email list. >> >> Regards, >> Monica Wilson >> >> >> > <image.tiff> >> >> >> From: GreenYes@no.address [mailto:GreenYes@no.address] On Behalf >> Of LWheeler45@no.address >> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 12:40 AM >> To: amuller@no.address; arboone3@no.address; GreenYes@no.address >> Subject: [GreenYes] Re: Biosolids. Sealed means independent testing ! >> >> >> Sealed means independent testing with the seal of the testing lab embossed on >> the pages like a notary. >> >> I will send you a copy off net of sampled sealed test info and the details >> onmachine I observed which was greatly improved since 2004. >> >> The energy balance varies depending on what is put in as is demonstrated in >> the Westinghouse system. Plama reduic of Coal yield is much better than sewer >> sludge. >> >> Plasma loves all plastics especially auto fluff. >> >> Fla has lots of waste streams that are more or less pure high hydrocarbon >> containing feedstock types this allows even greater efficiency and thruput. >> >> By the way anyone that says Plasma is incineration is clueless on the >> process. NO FLAME inert gas no oxygen involved. And really really clean. EPA >> emissions sheet on Medical Waste will be sent to you off net. >> >> AS far as cost is concerned the deal that the old plasma company made to my >> county was FREE system contracted waste stream and agreed on price of >> electrical power which was better than our existing Covanta contract. Lake Co >> has one of three legacy waste to enegy plants in Fla. Uses Natural Gas to >> keep the temps consistent and lots of water to control emissions. We also >> have a class Blandfill and ash to contend with. And Lake CO also recycles >> glass, plastic, cardboard and metals cans and white goods. >> >> >> >> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]