[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Hi Kendall, Insufficient testing frequency and compehensiveness have made me a bit skeptical of data regarding the cleanliness of biosolids in the past. Do you have any sense of how adequately NYC tests theirs? Doug _______________________________ Doug Koplow Earth Track, Inc. 2067 Massachusetts Avenue - 4th Floor Cambridge, MA 02140 www.earthtrack.net Tel: 617/661-4700 Fax: 617/354-0463 CONFIDENTIAL This message, and all attachments thereto, is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. >>> "Kendall Christiansen" <kendall@no.address> 08/23/06 08:30AM >>> With respect to recent posts regarding biosolids, a collection of observations, and some info: 1. good regular source of info about biosolids industry, practices, training, regulation, etc. is www.biosolids.org <http://www.biosolids.org/> , the site of the National Biosolids Partnership - supported by EPA, with perhaps a hundred or more municipal wastewater agencies (and states) as active members..free weekly e-newsletter useful way to keep pace. 2. in NYC, since ocean dumping of sewage sludge ceased in 1992, biosolids has become quiet success story, to wit: a. 100% beneficial reuse b. 70% meets Class A standards; 30% Class B c. Over 50% converted locally into fertilizer pellets for marketing for agricultural purposes, including orange groves in FL d. Modest amount used locally for roadsides, ballfields, etc. e. Annual cost decreased from over $100M initially to a stable mid-$50M, with an array of long-term contracts that diversify processing and markets f. An industry expert once told me anecdotally that 'NYC has the cleanest biosolids', perhaps due to effective pre-treatment programs, and decline in local industry 3. NJ's recently adopted Solid Waste Management Plan projects @ 70% beneficial reuse statewide of its biosolids; plan also calls for improved local coordination between local wastewater and solid waste management agencies (i.e., states differ in whether biosolids must be included in SWMPs, as is the case in NYC) 4. Several municipalities market biosolids at retail, most notably Tacoma (TaGro) and Milwaukee (Milorganite) 5. Landfilling of biosolids is most likely to still occur where landfill space/access is cheapest option 6. Beyond methane collection/reuse at wastewater treatment facilities, increasing attention being paid to opportunities for energy production from biosolids, including production of alternative liquid fuels Per #3, would be interested in learning whether any local wastewater agencies partner with their solid waste counterparts and allow direct input of source-separated organics into biosolids processing operations (i.e., skipping the wastewater treatment front-end), in order to consolidate composting operations, improve organic content of biosolids, etc. Have heard anecdotally that SF may do some of that, as a supplement to shipping source-separated organics to distant composting facility. Notwithstanding the above, biosolids obviously is not without its controversies, like nearly every other aspect of solid waste management/recycling. Hope the above is helpful to those interested. Kendall Christiansen Gaia Strategies 151 Maple Street Brooklyn, NY 11225 o: 718.941.9535; cell: 917.359.0725 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]