[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
fyi ------------------------- Europe urged to rethink the waste hierarchy Environment Daily 1791, 16/12/04 ------------------------- A group of economists brought together by Denmark's Environmental assessment institute (EAI) has called on the EU to rethink its use of the waste hierarchy. The bloc places too much emphasis on recycling, and recycling targets are too harmonised, the institute said following a seminar at its Copenhagen offices. Complaints about "rigid" application of the waste hierarchy are almost as old as the concept itself. EAI is calling for cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to be used as the key tool to prioritise between waste management options. Four years ago EU employers' association Unice was calling for exactly the same kind of flexibility under a banner of "integrated resource and waste management" (ED 28/03/00 http://www.environmentdaily.com/articles/index.cfm?action=article&ref=7311). At the seminar organised to discuss EAI's planned report on the waste hierarchy, environmental economist David Pearce was most forthright in his criticism of the status quo. "I'd rather get rid of it" [the hierarchy], because it inevitably leads to problems, he told the meeting. Professor Pearce reported research that both the EU's 1994 and revised 2004 packaging directives "fail" the cost-benefit test. The first imposed costs of UK£74 (?108) per tonne recovery while avoiding social costs worth UK£30-50 in landfill impacts and UK£6-7 in terms of other environmental externalities, he reported, giving a benefits to costs ratio of only 0.6/1. The second has even higher recycling targets. Meanwhile, University of Michigan academic Richard Porter argued against "quantity-based" policies such as high and fixed recycling targets and for "price-based" policies. Policy makers often prefer the former, despite their shortcomings, because they are easy to do and don't require detailed study to justify, he claimed. Developed in the 1970s, the waste hierachy gives top priority to source reduction (waste prevention), followed, in order by reuse, recycling (plus composting), incineration and finally landfill. Under a more detailed ranking incineration with energy recovery is followed by landfill with energy recovery, then straight incineration and finally straight landfill. "... _________________________ Peter Anderson, President RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING 4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15 Madison, WI 53705-4964 Ph: (608) 231-1100 Fax: (608) 233-0011 Cell: (608) 698-1314 eMail: anderson@no.address web: www.recycleworlds.net |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]