[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
I don't disagree with you Peter. Coke deserves credit for making the change that we asked them to (If they in fact did). But sometimes recycling feels like a bandaid on the problem. The more I learn about plastics (especially as containers for food/drink) the less I want to encourage the production and use of them. And while I understand why plastic is so popular, the truly sustainable path does not include the production of synthetic, toxic, non-biodegradable polymers from a non-renewable resource. And while it's a good thing for Coke to use less virgin material in its bottles, the recycled plastic isn't any better for our health than the new plastic. We need to move away from petroleum-based plastics altogether. This is where the recycling movement ends and the Zero Waste movement begins...with redesign. Linda Smith Community Outreach Manager Eco-Cycle 303.444.6634 P.S. Donate your car, truck, boat or RV to Eco-Cycle. Get the details at www.ecocycle.org/cardonation -----Original Message----- From: Peter Anderson [mailto:anderson@no.address] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:11 AM To: GreenYes Subject: [greenyes] Coke, Refillables and Recycling With reference to the Greenpeace posting: GREENPEACE ACTIVISTS REPRESENTING CHARACTERS COMING BACK FROM THE FUTURE TO FIGHT WASTE. GREENPEACE RETURN PLASTIC BOTTLES TO COCA COLACONTAINING THOUSANDS OF MESSAGES FROM CONSUMERS IN AN APPEAL TO SCIENCE FICTION, A 16 PEOPLE GROUP CAME FROM THE FUTURE TO FIGHT THE GROWING PROBLEM OF WASTE. THE FIRST TARGET OF THE GROUP WAS COCA COLA BECAUSE THEIR GROWING PRODUCTION OF DISPOSABLE BOTTLES. Certainly, for those looking to build sustainable structures in the future, it is unfortunate that the day of refillable bottles has passed in so much of the world. Also, leadership is sorely needed on bottle bills in a time when single serve containers are eroding recovery rates, and certainly the market leader is always a perennial target. On the other hand, as recyclers, we need to recognize Coke for the major initiative it took in 2000 to voluntarily commit to use 10% recycled content in its plastic bottles, which culminated in years of behind the scenes work to help commercialize recycled PET technologies. For years PET recycling had been struggling financially in significant part because the cost premium for producing food grade bottle resin from recycled instead of virgin plastic made it impossible to gain a beach head in those higher paying bottle markets. Recyclers had been largely relegated to the committed, but low value, fiber markets, with their dependency on the gut-wrenching and extremely volatile markets in China. The sheer volumes controlled by Coke was the catalyst that moved the equipment market to develop the technology to use curbside collected PET bottles to be recycled back into those high paying bottle markets, and also to eliminate the costly re-pelletization process (about 8-10 cents per pound). Absent those changes that made recycled PET competitive in the bottle-to-bottle market, this major part of the reason for strengthening prices received by recyclers would not have happened, and it only did happen because of Coke's commitment here. So, certainly there is a need to continue to push for more sustainable practices in other areas as well, but, at the same time, I feel that we will ill-serve our own interests if we fail to acknowledge the positive things that companies have done, especially when it is not just PR but major substantive progress. I recognize that this may be controversial, and tie me down defending these views in the coming weeks, but I feel quite strongly that it needs to be said. Otherwise, if we fail to give credit where it is due, we will remove any incentive for other industries to cooperate with our policy nostrums. Peter _________________________ Peter Anderson, President RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING 4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15 Madison, WI 53705-4964 Ph: (608) 231-1100 Fax: (608) 233-0011 Cell: (608) 698-1314 eMail: anderson@no.address web: www.recycleworlds.net CONFIDENTIAL This message, and all attachments thereto, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C., Sections 2510-2521. This message is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify me if you received this message in error at anderson@no.address and then delete it. |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]