[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
One source for the direction this thread has gone is probably the following article on the Grist webzine, which appeared last week: http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2004/10/27/scherer-christian/ as well as the recent, widely discussed article on the role of religion in Bush's presidency, which appeared in the New York Times Magazine. Having read both articles, I hesitate to dismiss the concern as blithely as Ken does. Brad -----Original Message----- From: Ken McEntee [mailto:ken@no.address] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:39 PM To: Pete Pasterz Cc: sswaim@no.address; spbloom@no.address; greenyes@no.address Subject: Re: [greenyes] RE: PEER Press Release Well then, to bring it back on-topic, can somebody please tell me where this nonsense came from about Bush's God-given duty being to exploit the Earth's resources? As somebody who is not a supporter of Bush (nor of Kerry, by the way. As always, our choices are bad and worse), I think it is irresponsible to spread such unfounded ridiculousness. There are plenty of questionable things we can bring up about Bush and the rest of his family as is the case with most politicians. We can debate about why we are in Iraq. We can dispair at the record federal deficit. We can disagree with his environmental policies. But in doing so let's use some common sense. If you want to argue that he will exploit natural resources to make money, make your case. But Bush wants to use up all the Earth's resources before the Jewish preacher (his name is Jesus, by the way) comes back? You've got to be kidding me. And if the world IS going to end soon, like in the next couple years, can somebody let me know? I am working way too hard and if we only have a couple years left I think I might have enough saved up for retirement. Ken |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]