[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Hi Megan ~ The Wisconsin Department of Revenue found that the tax breaks that Wisconsin provides to forest lands are basically only subsidizing the timber industry. I believe that if the subsidies were eliminated, the cost of virgin fiber to the mills would increase and that recyclers would receive a higher price for their paper. This would make recycling program more economical, resulting in more scrap paper being recycled, and at the same time reduce the consumption of fiber. I am not in favor of giving subsidies; I am instead in favor of imposing fees that reflect the cost of the environmental externalities. I would hope that the WTO would take a more aggressive stand against subsidies. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Megan Kershner [mailto:Mkershner@no.address] > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:10 AM > To: greenyes@no.address > Subject: RE: [greenyes] U.S. Trade Policy > > > I can't speak for all subsidized industries, but I do know > that current > private forest tax breaks/subsidies in Wisconsin are about the only > thing keeping private forests from turning into subdivisions. Without > incentives to do the right thing, who will? Energy conservation is a > prime example. > > And then I have to ask myself - is it really the tax breaks and > subsidies that is creating this waste product? Will removing the tax > breaks and subsidies change demand? Maybe. > > Megan > Boise, Idaho > > > >>> "Reindl, John" <Reindl@no.address> 10/13/2004 7:07:23 AM >>> > On the issue of tax subsidies and the wTO, does anyone have any > information > about why the subsidies for mining and forestry are also not being > brought > before the WTO? > > As a recycler, I am especially concerned about the subsidies to > forestry, > since paper and wood are the largest components of the material stream > that > we handle, and are the largest parts of what goes into landfills. > > Forestry not only receives massive subsidies in the US at the federal > level, > but also at the state and local level, through state and county > ownership of > forests that don't pay property taxes, income taxes or sales taxes, > and > programs to provide tax breaks for private forests, such as > Wisconsin's, > which has a price tag of somewhere around $50 to $100 million a year. > > John Reindl > Dane County, WI > > > > > I would like, if I may, to ask you a question concerning basic trade > > > principles, in light of the U.S. position with regard to our Airbus > dispute > > with the European Community. > > > > If I understand our position in that case correctly, we argue that > free > > trade under WTO rules is not whatever laissez-faire decrees, but > rather > "is > > about fair competition and a level playing field," as you were > quoted in > the > > October 7, 2004 Wall Street Journal ("U.S., Europe Sue Each > Other at > WTO > > Over Aircraft Subsidies"). In that regard, it seems to be our claim > that > > Airbus enjoys excessively large tax subsidies, creating an unlevel > playing > > > field on which Boeing cannot fairly compete. We, therefore, have > petitioned > > to have WTO rule that the tax subsidies are an unfair trade > practice, > > > subject to penalties. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: greenyes-unsubscribe@no.address > For additional commands, e-mail: greenyes-help@no.address > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: greenyes-unsubscribe@no.address > For additional commands, e-mail: greenyes-help@no.address > |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]