[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Bob Krasowski asks: "I live in a large County (Collier, Florida) that is developing a strategy for residential/comercial solid waste, and residential recycling collection franchise bids. The County has 91,000 curbside residential pickups. Data on the number of multifamily and business accounts is still being processed. "My question is. How can I determine how many separate "Zones" can be created in a given system to allows for competition and comparison yet not cause an increase in the cost of the programs due to inefficiency of scale?" Gary wrote back that: "Let the market decide how many is efficient, by opening the system up to competition (see http://www.crra.com/irc/guide.html). If there are concerns about having too many collectors involved in any one location, consider multiple semi-exclusive franchises, like we did in Hawthorne, CA (see http://www.cityofhawthorne.com/pwks_cref-index.htm)" Let me add to Gary's response to zero in on the question you ask about scale efficiencies for trash collection. As CRRA notes, recycle collection has other considerations. The minimum size that you may want to consider is the number of stops that one truck can collect from in a week. That will vary with the topography, density, household size, waste generation, traffic, time to offload, and fleet types, but one rule of thumb might be a district with in the order of 10,000 people. Then, one needs to recognize that a new operator entering the market, for example, cannot run just a single truck because it can break down. A back up truck is needed, typically one for every five trucks operating. The optimal size fleet to gain the first threshold for scale efficiencies, then, would be five minimum sized district. What needs to be borne in mind is that there are cross currents here that need to be factored into your analysis. In one sense, it is certainly true that the more hauling firms that can be brought into the market, the more competition will tend to be engendered. On the other hand, breaking up the exclusive districts into too small pieces can make it very difficult for anyone but the largest firms to compete. As noted in the foregoing explanation, if the district is too small to fully utilize one truck, then the new entrant would find it difficult to bid for that exclusve district contact competitively with the large firms that have commensurately large fleets within which to move trucks back and forth and can assume that their truck is fully utilized, which the new guy might not be able to do. Similarly, unless the contract term is at least 5 years and even better 8 years, in order to amortize the capital cost over the life of the equipment, that new guy may not even be able to get a bank loan to finance purchase of the truck. Peter _____________________________ Peter Anderson, Executive Director CENTER FOR A COMPETITIVE WASTE INDUSTRY 4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15 Madison, WI 53705-4964 Ph: (608) 231-1100 Fax: (608) 233-0011 Cell: (608) 698-1314 eMail: anderson@no.address web: www.competitivewaste.org |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]