[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
The discussion on landfill bans of organics has been very interesting. I much appreciate all the thought and time that has gone into everyone's comments. As a solution to the issues that have been raised, how about a ban on collection with mixed waste/garbage/trash, rather than a ban on landfill disposal? To my simple minded way of thinking that avoids all these complexities of inadvertently feeding an incinerator. It's the method we've adopted here in parts of the Northwest (e.g., King County, Seattle) for yard debris - a ban on collection in the garbage container rather than a ban on disposal. It's also the way that Seattle intends to implement their ban on disposal of recyclables - in practice it will be enforced at the generator's (both households and businesses) garbage container, not at the transfer station/disposal site. I'm rather ignorant of the multitudinous variations in garbage collection practices around the world, but it's hard for me to imagine anyone collecting the separated organics stream and then sending it to an incinerator rather than to a composting facility. That is, as long as there is that dirty third stream of mixed garbage still being collected. (Thus, my inherent distrust of any two stream system that has the "all other" in either the recycling stream or the composting stream, or some of it in both.) Here's a follow on thought. Once we get businesses and households thoroughly trained/accustomed/indoctrinated to putting all recyclables in the recycling stream (whether single or multi-bin), and all non-recyclable organics in the organics stream, that third stream will get down to the 10-20% amount -- or less, assuming significant financial incentives for diversion, equally convenient collection for the recycling and composting streams, enforcement of bans on collection of organics or recyclables in the garbage stream, and continual educational/promotional efforts to reinforce diversion. At that point we can begin to do variable rates/pay as you throw charges on the recycling and composting streams to push waste minimization/reduction/prevention. That's my perspective on how to evolve the collection system to promote both diversion from disposal and waste reduction as well. Meanwhile EPR policies will be pushing product manufacturers to make fewer and fewer items that are not readily recyclable or compostable. (My concern about some EPR schemes is that they might promote an excessive amount of individual trips in cars to take back centers, which is a much less efficient -- both economically and environmentally -- collection system than putting discards in the recycling or composting bus when it comes by your house or place of business. I.e., curbside collection is a mass transit system for recovering discards.) That's my hope for eventually getting rid of both landfills and incinerators as we aim for zerowaste. Jeffrey Morris, PhD - Economics Sound Resource Management - Seattle 3436B 34th Avenue West Seattle, WA 98199 206-599-6734 360-319-2391 mobile jeff.morris@no.address www.zerowaste.com |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]