[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Hi all, I thought you'd like to read the letter that our mayor wrote to the mayor of Minneapolis in support of the amazing nonprofit group named Eureka who is in danger of losing a local recycling bid to the multinational trash haulers. The whole issue of how cities write their bids for recycling services is a problem, and in 1998 Eco-Cycle almost lost our local contract to a waste hauler even though our bid was lower and our experience MUCH deeper. We fought like a tiger, and won, and as you can see, our local mayor is happy that we did. I am SURE that the mayor of Minneapolis, and the city staff, will be much happier with Eureka as their service provider, and the community will be served at a much higher level than the "limited scope" bidding process even imagined. So, if any of you haven't let the city leaders in Minneapolis know how you feel about this issue, please do. The fight is still on !! Eric from Eco-Cycle (Letter from Mayor of Boulder, Colorado) Dear Mayor Rybak: I have been following the debate on the recycling contract for the City of Minneapolis from afar. Boulder went through a similar debate 5 years ago, when we needed to choose a vendor to operate the new facilities for the Boulder County Recycling and Composting Authority. While I am sure there are many differences in detail, the overall context seems similar, so I'd like to offer you some observations from our experience. We had bids from Ecocycle, a local nonprofit recycler which is quite similar to Eureka Recycling; Western Disposal, our large local trash hauler, and a couple of proposals involving national trash haulers. The evaluation of the bids, and their consideration by the Authority, was very controversial. Ecocycle had the lowest cost bid for building and operating the facility. However, the staff analysis favored Western Disposal, as staff believed that the Western bid included a better facility, and believed that Western would be more able to back up their bid financially. Ultimately, the Authority made the decision to do a design/build contract for construction of the facility, and to contract with Ecocycle for the operation. We have been very pleased with the results. Ecocycle has been able to operate the facility at a very competitive cost; perhaps even more important, they are plowing all of the margin they make into expanded recycling and waste diversion opportunities for our citizens. I am sure that the private haulers could have done a competent job running the facility; I am equally sure that they would not be pushing the envelope to bring us a center for hard to recycle materials, new food waste composting initiatives, the zero waste institute, or other innovations which help meet city environmental goals, and are warmly embraced by our residents. Instead, their profit margin would go into the pockets of their shareholders. I would urge you to consider this decision very carefully, and to recognize all of the value that a community based nonprofit recycler can provide to your community. Sincerely Yours, Will Toor Mayor, Boulder, Colorado Eric Lombardi Executive Director Eco-Cycle, Inc Boulder, CO 303-444-6634 www.ecocycle.org "Recycling may not save the world, but the recycling spirit might." |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]