GreenYes Archives
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] Fwd: California E-Waste Veto Message
- Subject: [GreenYes] Fwd: California E-Waste Veto Message
- From: Gary Liss <gary@garyliss.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:10:55 -0700
Apologies for Cross-Posting
From: "Paparian, Michael"
<Paparian@CIWMB.ca.gov>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 02:45:32 -0700
To the Members of the
California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill
1523 without my signature. However, I am willing to sign legislation that
challenges industry to assume greater responsibility for the recycling
and disposal of electronic waste.
I am very troubled by an
increasing electronic waste pollution problem in California, as well as
across our nation. Local governments report increasing costs to
handle, transport and recycle discarded electronic equipment.
The amassing stockpile of
obsolete and broken computer monitors and televisions grows daily.
I am equally disturbed that this dangerous cargo is being sent to
underdeveloped nations exposing children to hazardous waste materials. I
applaud the author's effort to address these problems.
However, I am concerned that this program is not the most efficient or
cost effective approach for California. This bill requires the
state to hire 64 new people, at a time when the Legislature has directed
the Administration to cut 7,000 positions. Moreover, I believe that
building a state bureaucracy to address this problem is not the best
solution for managing electronic waste. We should compel industry
to solve this problem.
California has always been a global leader in the electronics
industry. I challenge the industry to lead the way and devise an
innovative solution for the source reduction, recycling, and safe
disposal of electronic waste. Industry already has initiated
several successful incentive programs that create a partnership between
the consumer and the manufacturer. I believe this would be a better
model for California and would foster the concept of an environmentally
sustainable electronic and technology industry and provides incentives to
design products that are less toxic and more recyclable. Moreover, we
simply must demonstrate our leadership and compassion by making sure that
California's electronic waste is not irresponsibly sent to underdeveloped
nations.
The European Union is working on a program to assure that manufacturers
maintain responsibility for the safe recycling of the products they
produce. I am encouraged by the product stewardship approach and
believe this model, tailored to fit California's recycling and disposal
infrastructure is worth pursuing. California needs a comprehensive
and innovative state law that partners with product manufacturers,
establishes recycling targets, and provides for the safe recycling and
disposal of electronic waste. Setting environmental standards and
providing manufacturers flexibility to meet them is the cornerstone of
California's air quality laws and has generated a new generation of car
emission reduction technologies and improved air quality for the
public. I am convinced we can do the same for electronic
waste.
I strongly urge industry and other interested parties to rapidly devise a
solution, in keeping with the goals I've articulated in this
message. There is no time to waste. I believe California
should have a new law next year.
I am asking my Secretary of the California Environmental Protection
Agency to take a leadership role in working with the Legislature,
government, industry, and stakeholders to create a successful California
electronic waste program. I am directing the Department of General
Services to take steps to assure that the state purchases electronic
products that minimize environmental impacts and that state electronic
equipment is recycled using best available practices.
Sincerely,
GRAY DAVIS
Gary Liss
916-652-7850
Fax: 916-652-0485
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]