[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Re: [GreenYes] RE: compressed air
- Subject: Re: [GreenYes] RE: compressed air
- From: muna@iafrica.com
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:51:21 +0200
On 16 Apr 2002 at 14:51, TomT wrote:>
> Just from a technical standpoint, I don't think air would be the best
> choice, but your point is well made.
>
great - what alternative did you have in mind? Compressed fluid conjures up all kinds
of possibilities, I am sure, but would agree that water would work? where would it go
once we have transferred the energy to the car etc?
The main reason I asked, was after thinking about this, and also considering water, it
concerend me that maybe the water would just go to waste; and as we in SA receive
about half the average planetary rainfall, these other issues would become critical...
> I think it's possible. In fact, if they took the 'improvements' that
> they NEEDED to put on "clean cars", on regular cars, imagine the fuel
> savings there! Then couple that with the compressed fluid idea...
again, the issue of perverse subsidies and investments....
Muna
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]