[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] GRRN Supports CIWMB Zero Waste Goal
- Subject: [GreenYes] GRRN Supports CIWMB Zero Waste Goal
- From: "Bill Sheehan" <zerowaste@grrn.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:15:50 -0500
Linda Moulton Patterson, Chair
California Integrated Waste Management Board
1001 "I" Street
PO Box 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Dear Chair Moulton Patterson, and CIWMB
Boardmembers:
The GrassRoots Recycling Network supports
the California Integrated Waste Management
Board's visionary goals outlined in the 2001
Strategic Plan, especially the zero waste
goal.
The GrassRoots Recycling Network (GRRN) is
a North American network of recycling and
community-based activists who advocate
policies and practices to achieve zero
waste, to end corporate welfare for waste,
and to create sustainable jobs from
discards. GRRN was founded in 1995 by
members of the Sierra Club Solid Waste
Committee, the California Resource Recovery
Association, and the Institute for Local
Self-Reliance.
We strongly support your efforts to include
environmental justice, environmentally
preferable procurement, and other elements;
however, I will focus my comments on the
zero waste goal because that is the umbrella
that encompasses the rest.
I have seen the comments posted by certain
industry representatives on the California
Chamber of Commerce website. I would like
to address a fundamental misconception,
namely that zero waste implies "recycling
100 percent of the state's solid waste
stream," and therefore "ignores the law of
diminishing returns."
The zero waste goal specifically
acknowledges the need to go beyond recycling
and beyond dealing with waste at the 'back
end.' Instead of managing waste, the zero
waste paradigm emphasizes managing resources
and eliminating waste at the design stage.
Most of the challenge in working towards
zero waste lies at the 'front end.' To
achieve sustainability, all products and
packaging must be designed to either be
returned to nature (like compost) or to
returned to the economy. The latter implies
design for reuse, repair, disassembly and
recycling. Tax disincentives and lack of
brand-owner responsibility are two key
barriers to zero waste.
This is not to say there is little to be
done at the community level. Zero waste is
definitely in the community interest, and
developing model zero waste communities is
the next big challenge. Local government,
which has primary responsibility for wasted
resources, is needed not so much to do the
heavy lifting, but to change the rules so
that resource conservation out-competes
resource wasting every time.
It is ironic that the industry taking the
lead opposing the inclusion of zero waste
goals is the plastics industry. Although
plastics bring many benefits, the industry
has an overall wasting rate of 95 percent;
uses a non-renewable resource, and has
significant toxics issues in production and
waste disposal. If any industry needs
encouragement to design for sustainability
it would seem to be plastics.
California has long been a leader in
resource conservation and recycling. It is
only fitting that California now take a lead
role in developing a zero waste goal and
program. GRRN applauds your visionary
efforts.
Sincerely,
/Bill Sheehan, Ph.D.
Executive Director
*********************************
Bill Sheehan
Executive Director
GrassRoots Recycling Network
P.O. Box 49283
Athens, GA 30604-9283
Tel: 706-613-7121 Fax: -7123
Email: zerowaste@grrn.org
Web: http://www.grrn.org
*********************************
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]