[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Re: greenyes-d Digest V01 #32
- Subject: Re: greenyes-d Digest V01 #32
- From: "BRING Recycling" <bring@efn.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:54:14 -0800
Ashcroft, Bush, Cheney and their ilk are repugnant, and they give
every indication of running roughshod over existing environmental
policy. Even the small gains that have been made in the past are
not secure. However, I must agree that discussing overpopulation
and abortion seems off topic for this forum. I disagree that the
root problem is overpopulation. I think more to blame are
inappropriate technologies that are resource intensive and
wasteful, politicians who are owned by corporations, corporations
that are nearsighted and can't see the harm they cause to the
environment and to people, an unrealistic lifestyle in developed
nations, etc. These are the issues that bind us together and keep
us involved in this forum. If we are to attack politicains, let's
at least do it in the context of the forum, in terms that unite
and galvanize our disparate views.
David Wollner
BRING Recycling
----- Original Message -----
From: <greenyes-d-request@earthsystems.org>
To: <greenyes-d@earthsystems.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:00 AM
Subject: greenyes-d Digest V01 #32
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
> greenyes-d Digest Volume 01 : Issue 32
>
> Today's Topics:
> RE: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft Nomination
[ TomT <tomt@mwes.com> ]
> Re: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft Nomination
[ JillMJ77@aol.com ]
> Re: [GreenYes] Trends - Small Scale
[ Muna Lakhani <muna@iafrica.com> ]
>
> Administrivia:
> **************************************************************
> This is the digest version of the greenyes mailing list.
> If should ever need to unsubscribe from this digest, write
> a letter to greenyes-d-request@earthsystems.org with the
> subject unsubscribe. Address letters to the list to
> greenyes@earthsystems.org
>
> To accommodate all digest subscribers, the digest will now
> be sent out in plain text.
>
>
>
> For those who have asked:
>
> GETTING MORE THAN ONE DIGEST A DAY?
>
> The digest is sent out when its contents reach a certain
> file size. If there are a lot of messages posted to
> GreenYes in a day, especially large messages, more than one
> digest may be sent out. This is completely normal and is done
> to ease the burden on our server and to prevent you from
> having an excessively large message in your inbox.
> **************************************************************
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:22:42 -0600
> From: TomT <tomt@mwes.com>
> To: "'Ann Schneider'" <schneiderann@juno.com>,
> multiple recipients of
> <greenyes@earthsystems.org>
> Cc: greenyes@earthsystems.org
> Subject: RE: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft
Nomination
> Message-ID:
<B3DF40E95BD0D411AABB00A0CC61D5C801932B@server.mwes.local>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C08B0B.29FF57B8"
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08B0B.29FF57B8
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ann,
> Thank you for responding to my question.
> I think I understand the gist of your short answer.
> I have to admit though that I disagree w/ some key points.
>
> >The overriding environmental problem in the world is too many
people.
>
> I don't believe this to be the problem. I believe that the
world is quite
> capable of supporting the current population. The problem is
that people
> are irresponsible and self-serving. As you pointed out,
Americans use more
> resources than any other country. The solution is to curb our
insatiable
> appetite - our appetite for material goods/wealth and our
appetite for sex
> (to name just a few). Every time we hop into our 4-wheel drive
6 cylinder
> car to drive a half a block to pick up a package of individually
sliced and
> wrapped cheese, we fail our environment in several ways. Every
time we
> dance beneath the sheets in an irresponsible manner, we fail our
> environment, also I believe in several ways.
>
> Abortion is not the answer - it's another self-serving
irresponsible
> band-aid.
>
> People are starving all over the world. The problem isn't over
population.
> It's the distribution and waste of resources due to
irresponsibility that is
> the problem.
>
> >Ashcrofts belief that there should be no birth control, and
especially no
> abortion,hense no family planning hence more unplanned or
unwanted
> pregnancies
>
> My wife and I practice natural family planning. This means that
we don't
> use abortion as a means of birth control. It also means that we
don't use
> artificial means of birth control such as prophylactics and
especially
> abortafacients such as the pill or IUDs. That's true natural
family
> planning for people who take responsibility for their actions.
>
> >Let me point out that no one wants an abortion. What is needed
is
> comprehensive family planning and education, both here in the US
and
> around the world.
>
> Over 1 million children are killed every year and over 38
million have been
> killed since Roe vs Wade (we're talking just in the US). I
think at least a
> few people want an abortion.
>
> I agree on the education part. I am leary on what you mean by
> "comprehensive family planning". Does this include abortion as
a means of
> birth control? Or artificial birth control methods such as the
pill or IUDs
> which act (at least in part) as abortifacients?
>
> >Second, from a woman's perspective freedom of choice is very
important.
>
> No one wants an abortion, but it should be an option?
>
> My heart goes out to EVERY woman who has had an abortion,
legally or not.
> And my heart also goes out to those unwanted chilren (UNWANTED
CHILDREN - my
> God, how sinister is that?) that are killed every couple of
minutes (again,
> just in the US).
>
> >These non-medical operations often killed the woman or
permnently
> sterilized her
>
> Women are stilled killed or sterilized from abortion. And what
about the
> emotional baggage that goes along w/ an abortion (legally
performed or not)?
>
> And where do this aborted babies go? The landfill I'm guessing.
Is that
> egologically sound?
>
>
> Now that I understand a little bit more about Ashcroft's stand
on the
> environment and how his job might affect the environment, I can
understand
> why we should oppose him. But if we're opposing him (and bush)
because of
> his (their) view on birth control and abortion, I'm not with you
on this
> one.
>
> PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY is the ONLY solution.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann Schneider [mailto:schneiderann@juno.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:01 AM
> To: multiple recipients of
> Cc: greenyes@earthsystems.org
> Subject: Re: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft
Nomination
>
>
> Short Answer
>
> The overriding environmental problem in the world is too many
people.
> The more people, the more resources needed to sustain them and
the fewer
> resources/space for plants and animals. Americans use more
resources
> than people from any other country so every additional American
has a
> much larger impact on the environment. So reason number one for
the
> environment is Ashcrofts belief that there should be no birth
control,
> and especially no abortion, hense no family planning hence more
unplanned
> or unwanted pregnancies, more people, more resource
consumption.
>
> Let me point out that no one wants an abortion. What is needed
is
> comprehensive family planning and education, both here in the US
and
> around the world.
>
> As you can see from one of bush's first actions - stopping US
funding of
> international family planning clinics that include discussion of
abortion
> or abortion * is a clear sign of conservative beliefs in this
area.
>
> * bush's order blocks funding from international clinics even if
the
> funding for abortion or discussion of abortion as an option
comes from
> other sources.
>
> Second, from a woman's perspective freedom of choice is very
important.
> Prior to 1973, it was illegal to have an abortion in the US.
Women with
> money could find a safe hospital, those without went to back
alley
> "abortion clinics". These non-medical operations often killed
the woman
> or permnently sterilized her. I don't believe Ashcroft will
protect
> freedom of choice and will lead us back to those dangerous
times.
>
> Second, it is the Attorney Generals responsibility to enforce
the laws of
> the nation but I think Ashcroft will not emphasize laws that he
does not
> believe in, e.g., women's right to choose, pollution
enforcement. Again,
> look at the other environmental cabinet nominee, Gale Norton,
who
> believes corporations can enforce environmental regulations on
> themselves. Or bush's policy in Texas where companies can
enforce
> environmental rules on themselves. Check the record in Texas to
find
> that it ihas one of the greatest levels of pollution in the US.
Put the
> two together and trying to protect the environment through
direct action
> may become quite difficult.
>
> Also remember that the Attorney General recommends federal
judges who
> decide on many environmental cases. So, the AT is very
important to the
> protection of the environment.
>
> It appears that Congress will pass Norton but take a stand on
Ashcroft
> because he is so far to the right.
>
> Hope this helps you understand my reasons for opposing Ashcroft.
(And I
> didn't get into his civil rights actions but can forward legions
of
> information on this area to anyone who is interested. If you
step on
> civil rights of people, what is to stop you from stepping on
protecting
> plants and animals.)
>
> Ann Schneider
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:18:50 -0600 TomT <tomt@mwes.com> writes:
> > Forgive my ignorance, but why do we oppose Ashcroft's
nomination?
> > Will his job affect the environment?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ann Schneider [mailto:schneiderann@juno.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:28 AM
> > To: multiple recipients of
> > Subject: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft Nomination
> >
> >
> > Okay, Mr. Cato, please bash me again, I respect your right to
> > say anything you wish. Perhaps you should respect action to
> > forward information.
> >
> > Ann Schneider
> >
> >
> > To counteract this enormous expenditure of corporate money we
> > urgently need your help:
> >
> > 1. If you have not yet done so, contact your own Senators of
> > whatever
> > party and tell them you are opposed to Ashcroft. You can find
their
> > phone numbers at
> >
> > http://congress.nw.dc.us/dem/congdir.html
>
>
> *****************************************************
> To post to the greenyes list, send a letter to:
> greenyes@earthsystems.org
> To unsubscribe, send a message to:
> greenyes-request@earthsystems.org with the subject
> unsubscribe. If you have any problems, please
> write to www@earthsystems.org.
> The GreenYes Listserv depends on reader support.
> Your tax-deductible contribution in any amount can be
> made by mail (check) or on the web (credit card) at
> our website: http://www.grrn.org. Just click on the
> "Support GRRN" button.
> GreenYes is archived at our website. Just click
> on the "GreenYes Listserv" button for directions.
> ******************************************************
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08B0B.29FF57B8
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
> 5.5.2650.12">
> <TITLE>RE: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft =
> Nomination</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Ann,</FONT>
> <BR> <FONT
SIZE=3D2>Thank you =
> for responding to my question.</FONT>
> <BR> =
> <FONT SIZE=3D2>I
think I =
> understand the gist of your short answer.</FONT>
> <BR> <FONT SIZE=3D2>I
have to =
> admit though that I disagree w/ some key points.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>The overriding environmental problem in
the world =
> is too many people.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I don't believe this to be the problem.
I =
> believe that the world is quite capable of supporting the
current =
> population. The problem is that people are irresponsible
and =
> self-serving. As you pointed out, Americans use more
resources =
> than any other country. The solution is to curb our
insatiable =
> appetite - our appetite for material goods/wealth and our
appetite for =
> sex (to name just a few). Every time we hop into our
4-wheel =
> drive 6 cylinder car to drive a half a block to pick up a
package of =
> individually sliced and wrapped cheese, we fail our environment
in =
> several ways. Every time we dance beneath the sheets in an
=
> irresponsible manner, we fail our environment, also I believe in
=
> several ways.</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Abortion is not the answer - it's another =
> self-serving irresponsible band-aid.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>People are starving all over the world.
The =
> problem isn't over population. It's the distribution and
waste of =
> resources due to irresponsibility that is the
problem.</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>Ashcrofts belief that there should be no
birth =
> control, and especially no abortion,hense no family planning
hence more =
> unplanned or unwanted pregnancies</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>My wife and I practice natural family
planning. =
> This means that we don't use abortion as a means of birth =
> control. It also means that we don't use artificial means
of =
> birth control such as prophylactics and especially
abortafacients such =
> as the pill or IUDs. That's true natural family planning
for =
> people who take responsibility for their actions.</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>Let me point out that no one wants an =
> abortion. What is needed is</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>comprehensive family planning and education,
both =
> here in the US and</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>around the world. </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Over 1 million children are killed every year
and =
> over 38 million have been killed since Roe vs Wade (we're
talking just =
> in the US). I think at least a few people want an =
> abortion.</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I agree on the education part. I am
leary on =
> what you mean by "comprehensive family
planning". Does =
> this include abortion as a means of birth control? Or
artificial =
> birth control methods such as the pill or IUDs which act (at
least in =
> part) as abortifacients?</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>Second, from a woman's perspective freedom
of =
> choice is very important.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>No one wants an abortion, but it should be an
=
> option?</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>My heart goes out to EVERY woman who has had
an =
> abortion, legally or not. And my heart also goes out to
those =
> unwanted chilren (UNWANTED CHILDREN - my God, how sinister is
that?) =
> that are killed every couple of minutes (again, just in the =
> US).</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>These non-medical operations often killed
the =
> woman or permnently sterilized her</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Women are stilled killed or sterilized from =
> abortion. And what about the emotional baggage that goes
along w/ =
> an abortion (legally performed or not)?</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>And where do this aborted babies go? The
=
> landfill I'm guessing. Is that egologically sound?</FONT>
> </P>
> <BR>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Now that I understand a little bit more about
=
> Ashcroft's stand on the environment and how his job might affect
the =
> environment, I can understand why we should oppose him.
But if =
> we're opposing him (and bush) because of his (their) view on
birth =
> control and abortion, I'm not with you on this one.</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY is the ONLY
solution.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Ann Schneider [<A =
>
HREF=3D"mailto:schneiderann@juno.com";>mailto:schneiderann@juno.com
</A>]<=
> /FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:01
AM</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: multiple recipients of</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: greenyes@earthsystems.org</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to
Stop =
> Ashcroft Nomination</FONT>
> </P>
> <BR>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Short Answer</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The overriding environmental problem in the
world is =
> too many people. </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>The more people, the more resources needed to
=
> sustain them and the fewer</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>resources/space for plants and animals.
=
> Americans use more resources</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>than people from any other country so every =
> additional American has a</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>much larger impact on the environment.
So =
> reason number one for the</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>environment is Ashcrofts belief that there
should be =
> no birth control,</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>and especially no abortion, hense no family
planning =
> hence more unplanned</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>or unwanted pregnancies, more people,
more =
> resource consumption.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Let me point out that no one wants an
abortion. =
> What is needed is</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>comprehensive family planning and education,
both =
> here in the US and</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>around the world. </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>As you can see from one of bush's first
actions - =
> stopping US funding of</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>international family planning clinics that
include =
> discussion of abortion</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>or abortion * is a clear sign of conservative
=
> beliefs in this area.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>* bush's order blocks funding from
international =
> clinics even if the</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>funding for abortion or discussion of
abortion as an =
> option comes from</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>other sources.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Second, from a woman's perspective freedom of
choice =
> is very important. </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Prior to 1973, it was illegal to have an
abortion in =
> the US. Women with</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>money could find a safe hospital, those
without went =
> to back alley</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>"abortion clinics". These =
> non-medical operations often killed the woman</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>or permnently sterilized
her. I =
> don't believe Ashcroft will protect</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>freedom of choice and will lead us back to
those =
> dangerous times. </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Second, it is the Attorney Generals
responsibility to =
> enforce the laws of</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>the nation but I think Ashcroft will not
emphasize =
> laws that he does not</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>believe in, e.g., women's right to choose,
pollution =
> enforcement. Again,</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>look at the other environmental cabinet
nominee, =
> Gale Norton, who</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>believes corporations can enforce
environmental =
> regulations on</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>themselves. Or bush's policy in Texas
where =
> companies can enforce</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>environmental rules on themselves.
Check the =
> record in Texas to find</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>that it ihas one of the greatest levels of
pollution =
> in the US. Put the</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>two together and trying to protect the
environment =
> through direct action</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>may become quite difficult. </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Also remember that the Attorney General
recommends =
> federal judges who</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>decide on many environmental cases. So,
the AT =
> is very important to the</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>protection of the environment.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>It appears that Congress will pass Norton but
take a =
> stand on Ashcroft</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>because he is so far to the right.</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hope this helps you understand my reasons for
=
> opposing Ashcroft. (And I</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>didn't get into his civil rights actions but
can =
> forward legions of</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>information on this area to anyone who is =
> interested. If you step on</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>civil rights of people, what is to stop you
from =
> stepping on protecting</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>plants and animals.)</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Ann Schneider</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:18:50 -0600 TomT =
> <tomt@mwes.com> writes:</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Forgive my ignorance, but why do we
oppose =
> Ashcroft's nomination? </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Will his job affect the
environment?</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: Ann Schneider [<A =
>
HREF=3D"mailto:schneiderann@juno.com";>mailto:schneiderann@juno.com
</A>]<=
> /FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:28
AM</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: multiple recipients of</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to
Stop =
> Ashcroft Nomination</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Okay, Mr. Cato, please bash me again, I
respect =
> your right to </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> say anything you wish. Perhaps you
should =
> respect action to </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> forward information.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Ann Schneider</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To counteract this enormous expenditure
of =
> corporate money we </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> urgently need your help:</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> 1. If you have not yet done so, contact
your =
> own Senators of </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> whatever </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> party and tell them you are opposed to =
> Ashcroft. You can find their </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> phone numbers at </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> <A =
> HREF=3D"http://congress.nw.dc.us/dem/congdir.html"; =
>
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://congress.nw.dc.us/dem/congdir.html</A></F
ONT>
> </P>
> <BR>
>
> <P><FONT =
>
SIZE=3D2>*****************************************************</FO
NT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> To post to the greenyes
list, =
> send a letter to:</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>greenyes@earthsystems.org</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> To unsubscribe, send a
message =
> to:</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>greenyes-request@earthsystems.org with the =
> subject</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>unsubscribe. If you have any problems,
=
> please</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>write to www@earthsystems.org.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> The GreenYes Listserv
depends on =
> reader support.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Your tax-deductible contribution in any
amount can =
> be</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>made by mail (check) or on the web (credit
card) =
> at</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>our website: <A HREF=3D"http://www.grrn.org";
=
> TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.grrn.org</A>. Just click on
the</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>"Support GRRN" button.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> GreenYes is archived at
our =
> website. Just click</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>on the "GreenYes Listserv" button
for =
> directions.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT =
>
SIZE=3D2>******************************************************</F
ONT>
> </P>
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08B0B.29FF57B8--
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:41:35 EST
> From: JillMJ77@aol.com
> To: tomt@mwes.com, schneiderann@juno.com
> CC: greenyes@earthsystems.org
> Subject: Re: [GreenYes] Last Chance to Try to Stop Ashcroft
Nomination
> Message-ID: <24.107b7ad0.27a8b93f@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Enough.
>
> Please remove my name from this listserve or send me directions
on how to
> remove my name.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:59:38 +0200
> From: Muna Lakhani <muna@iafrica.com>
> To: greenyes <greenyes@earthsystems.org>
> Subject: Re: [GreenYes] Trends - Small Scale
> Message-id: <3A76D6DA.1B81@iafrica.com>
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>
> small scale power generation is good - however, we can all
easily agree
> that the most benign qualify - wind, solar, solar thermal,
biomass / bio
> gas, and micro-hydro...
>
> pretty much anything else creates a potential nightmare!!
imagine our
> (South Africa's) power utility getting permission to buils their
pebble
> bed modular reactors - we could have HUNDREDS of nuclear
reactors in
> places we havent even considered - like in your backyard,
powering a
> particulatr energy intensive industry... makes you think, yes?
>
> regards to all
>
> Muna Lakhani
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
> End of greenyes-d Digest V01 Issue #32
> **************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]