Title: [GreenYes] value of reuse building materials
I did a survey of building-related reused materials stores and found sale value at about $1.39/lb average of all the reuse materials they carry, i.e. take total sales divide by total tons sold across many stores. Another study in Florida of HfH ReStores found about $1.56/lb.
That would be about $2,900/ton...?
I have done best to create list of all reused building materials stores in the US quoting summary @ this author:
"The number of reused building materials stores in the US is about 1,200 as of 2006. (EXCLUDES used clothing and household goods reuse sales, re-milling of lumber into high-end products and antique and high-end architectural salvage, INCLUDES reused and donated “ordinary” surplus and salvaged building materials.
There is an estimated 315,000 tons/yr to 360,000 tons/yr of reused building materials sold by the approximately 1,200 reused building materials stores in the US.
The high end of this estimate is approximately 0.2% of total waste from building activities produced in the US each year based on latest estimate by US EPA."
Brad
Brad Guy
Ph.D. Program
School of Architecture
Carnegie Mellon University
Cell: 814-571-8659
The 2009 Building Materials Reuse Association International Deconstruction and Reuse Conference will be held in Chicago, IL, April 27-29, 2009. Check www.buildingreuse.org for monthly updates including the call for presentations.
--- On Mon, 8/11/08, RicAnthony@no.address <RicAnthony@no.address> wrote:
> From: RicAnthony@no.address <RicAnthony@no.address>
> Subject: [GreenYes] reuse
> To: GreenYes@no.address, zwia@no.address
> Date: Monday, August 11, 2008, 2:50 PM
> In a message dated 8/8/2008 9:03:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight
> Time,
> guy_brad@no.address writes:Hello Ric Anthony,
> Could you clarify this chart.. "Reuse" is a
> process and all the other lines
> are materials types.. the "Reuse" is 2.0% of
> total therefore does it exlcude
> all the materials types listed ? does this mean there is
> no reuse for any of
> them only recycle? and if so then what are the Reuse
> materials types?
>
>
>
>
> Hi Brad;
>
> By now you all have seen Dan and Mary Lou's comments.
>
> My two percent for reuse comes from looking at the
> detailed composition
> sorts in many Cities. I actually have some hands on
> experience. The lower market
> value is conservative and comes from an old Urban Ore
> report and still
> makes the reuse category the largest revenue generator by
> far. Even at these
> low rates and low prices the value is so high that
> traditional waste
> managers have a hard time believing. Imagine their chagrin
> when we put the price of
> paper at $100 and metal at $100 which today is very
> conservative.
>
> The paradigm shift is the market.
>
> Regarding the non marketable. I did add this category. I
> cannot find a
> market for soiled diapers. I don't want to compost or
> burn wood that is treated
> with heavy metals of poisons. And there is about 1% in
> each material sorting
> category that is made up of mixed materials designed for
> landfill. These
> are products that need to be take back for redesign.
>
> As for mistakes these are miss-throws.
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> Ricanthony@no.address
> RichardAnthonyAssociates.com
> San Diego, California
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and
> fits in your budget?
> Read reviews on AOL Autos.
> (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
> )
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group.
To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes+unsubscribe@no.address
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|