[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
All... The fact sheets for various materials that Chaz Miller did back in the 1990's were extremely useful, and it's too bad he's not still doing them. But I would not encourage anyone to use waste generation/disposal/recycling data that is 9 years old. For example, the aluminum packaging fact sheet said, "Industry data shows a 63.5% [aluminum] beverage can recycling rate in 1996." The aluminum can recycling rate in 2005, according to the Aluminum Association was 52%. BIG DIFFERENCE! In fact, recycling rates for all container materials are substantially lower than they were in 1996. NOTE: The aluminum can recycling rate is actually lower than 52% when imported scrap cans are deducted from the numerator. The 2005 rate, excluding imported scrap cans, was 45%. The recycling rate in 1996, excluding imported scrap cans, was 57.4%. Pat Franklin Executive Director Container Recycling Institute 1776 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.263.0999 fax 202.263.0949 www.container-recycling.org www.bottlebill.org > > A bit dated, but useful. > > http://www.csun.edu/~vceed002/BFI/waste_stats.html > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]