GreenYes Archives

[GreenYes Archives] - [Thread Index] - [Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]

RE: [greenyes] Administration's Science Position

In light of that "faith-based parks" agenda, a national movement and
court action should be started to offer Hopi and other native
explanations of the Grand Canyon origin, much less the rest of American
and human history. Park visitors might find it of interest to know they
are in the "fourth world," and that the Hopi made their way to it by
using Bakavi reeds (at least from what I read several years ago on it).

Bill Tarman-Ramcheck
Public Works Programs Analyst
City of Wauwatosa Public Works

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Anderson [mailto:anderson@no.address]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 4:54 PM
To: GreenYes
Subject: [greenyes] Administration's Science Position

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

Press Release

For Immediate Release: Wednesday, October 13, 2004
Contact: Chas Offutt (202) 265-7337

Promised Legal Review on Creationist Book Is Shelved

Washington, DC - The Bush Administration has decided that it will stand
its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah's
flood rather than by geologic forces, according to internal documents
released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

Despite telling members of Congress and the public that the legality and

appropriateness of the National Park Service offering a creationist book
sale at Grand Canyon museums and bookstores was "under review at the
national level by several offices," no such review took place, according
materials obtained by PEER under the Freedom of Information Act.
the real agency position was expressed by NPS spokesperson Elaine Sevy
quoted in the Baptist Press News:

"Now that the book has become quite popular, we don't want to remove

In August of 2003, Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Joe Alston
attempted to block the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View, by Tom
a book explaining how the park's central feature developed on a biblical

rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS Headquarters, however,
intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor, NPS Chief
Communications David Barna told reporters that there would be a
policy review, distributing talking points stating: "We hope to have a
decision in February [2004]." In fact, the promised review never
occurred -

a.. In late February, Barna crafted a draft letter to concerned
members of
Congress stating: "We hope to have a final decision on the book in March

2004." That draft was rewritten in June and finally sent out to
Congressional representatives with no completion date for the review at
b.. NPS Headquarters did not respond to a January 25th memo from its
top geologists charging that sale of the book violated agency policies
undercut its scientific education programs;
c.. The Park Service ignored a letter of protest signed by the
of seven scientific societies on December 16, 2003.
"Promoting creationism in our national parks is just as wrong as
it in our public schools," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, "If
Bush Administration is using public resources for pandering to Christian

fundamentalists, it should at least have the decency to tell the truth

The creationist book is not the only religious controversy at Grand
National Park. One week prior to the approved sale of Grand Canyon: A
Different View, NPS Deputy Director Donald Murphy ordered that bronze
plaques bearing Psalm verses be returned and reinstalled at canyon
overlooks. Superintendent Alston had removed the bronze plaques on legal

advice from Interior Department solicitors. Murphy also wrote a letter
apology to the plaques' sponsors, the Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary.
has collected other instances of what it calls the Bush Administration's

"Faith-Based Parks" agenda.

Peter Anderson, President
4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15
Madison, WI 53705-4964
Ph: (608) 231-1100
Fax: (608) 233-0011
Cell: (608) 698-1314
eMail: anderson@no.address

This message, and all attachments thereto,
is covered by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C., Sections 2510-2521.
This message is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message,
then any retention, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. Please notify me if you received
this message in error at anderson@no.address
and then delete it.

[GreenYes Archives] - [Date Index] - [Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]