RE: [greenyes] scavenging

["Lyman-Onkka, Cathi" <Cathi.Lyman-Onkka@no.address>]

Another issue is whether they are also going through the paper looking for
personal identification which could be used in identity theft. It may not
just be redemption dollars the scavengers are seeking.
Cathi
Cathi Lyman-Onkka
Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health
Environmental Health Section
cathi.lyman-onkka@no.address
Phone: 651-773-4449   Fax: 651-773-4454

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doug Koplow [mailto:koplow@no.address] 
Sent:	Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:20 PM
To:	greenyes@no.address; Sharon_Gates@no.address
Subject:	RE: [greenyes] scavenging

There seem to be a couple of issues going on here.  

1)  Revenue loss.  Do people feel like they are losing a significant
amount of revenue from homeless people with shopping carts?  While I can
see the benefit of sting operations to stop organized scavanging (such
as via vans), I wouldn't think there is much to be gained by trying to
stop homeless people from earning a bit of money.  There was some study
(I can't remember the title) that suggested that at least in bottle bill
states, the lost revenue on aluminum was reduced by the fact that many
scavengers were also taking deposit glass bottles as well, reducing
breakage and cross-contamination.

2)  Dumping.  The nuisance and recycling loss from dumped barrels does
seem to be a big problem.  However, as an earlier poster suggested, this
problem seems as though it can be dealt with by encouraging people to
segregate the deposit/rebate items so scavengers can get them easily. 
This is done in Cambridge, MA at public trash barrels, and seems to work
pretty well.  I think lots of people would actually like that their
deposits were going directly to somebody who needs them.

Doug
>>> <Sharon_Gates@no.address> 07/03/03 02:29PM >>>
I don't know about anybody else on this list, but I'd certainly not be

comfortable confronting scavengers about the illegality of their 
activities, especially in the wee hours.  And there's absolutely no way

I'd detain someone while we waited for the police to show up.  Maybe
Jaime 
is more comfortable doing this stuff than me -- he's a big guy and he 
speaks Spanish.

Sharon Gates
Recycling Specialist
City of Long Beach, California
562/570-4694




"Chris Cloutier" <Ccloutier@no.address>
07/03/2003 11:12 AM
Please respond to Ccloutier

 
        To:     "'Gary Liss'" <gary@no.address>,
Sharon_Gates@no.address 
        cc:     greenyes@no.address 
        Subject:        RE: [greenyes] scavenging


How many scavengers accepted the invitation to stay and be arrested?

Chris Cloutier
D&R International
1684 Selby Ave.
St. Paul, MN  55104
651.644.4017
651.644.4989 (f)

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Liss [mailto:gary@no.address] 
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Sharon_Gates@no.address 
Cc: greenyes@no.address 
Subject: Re: [greenyes] scavenging

Sharon,

The exact same thing has been happening in Hawthorne.  Recently, as
part 
of
the rollout of the new recycling system, Jaime Lozano (City of
Hawthorne)
has been working with the residential contractor (H&C Disposal) to do
"sting" operations in the early morning hours.
The main impetus for this sting operation was the mess left behind,
although the interest of the residential contractor was clearly related
to
their lost revenues as well, as they retain all revenues from sale of
recyclables collected.

They've gone out a number of times in the last month.  When they
spotted
people illegally scavenging, they stopped them and warned them that it
was
illegal to do in Hawthorne.  The scavenger would then leave.  If they
saw
the scavenger again, they then asked the scavenger to stay, and they 
called
the Police to come and arrest them.  You can contact Jaime Lozano at
jalozano@no.address for more info.


At 09:33 AM 07/03/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>The revenue loss from scavenging is a very minor factor in our
scavenging
>problem in Long Beach.  The problem is that people go through our
alleys
>and down our streets rifling through recycling bins, making noise,
>disturbing residents, etc.  Often the scavengers will dump the
contents 
of
>the bin, take what they want, and leave the rest on the ground.  Then

when
>the recycling truck comes by, the driver doesn't want to stop and
scoop
>everything up, to say nothing of all the material that has blown away.
 I
>was just speaking with a resident who was calling about scavenging,
and
>she said "if the guy is so comfortable going through my recycling bin
and
>taking what he wants, maybe he'll be just as comfortable taking
something
>off my porch or going in my back yard."  Regardless of whether or not
>scavenging leads to other kinds of theft, the last thing I want is
for
>residents to feel they are endangering themselves by setting out
their
>recycling.  If it was just a matter of the City losing a bit of
revenue,
>then the cost-benefit analysis of police response might work out so
that
>it really didn't make sense for the police to address scavenging.  But

the
>issue is really disturbing the peace, littering, and people feeling
safe
>in their homes -- issues that I think the police should be more
concerned
>about than they sometimes appear to be.
>
>Sharon Gates
>Recycling Specialist
>City of Long Beach, California
>562/570-4694
>
>
>
>
>"Wayne Turner" <WAYNET@no.address>
>07/03/2003 04:41 AM
>
>
>         To:     <greenyes@no.address>, <Sharon_Gates@no.address>
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: [greenyes] scavenging
>
>
>Sharon, et al.,
>
>Scavenging rises and falls with the markets for materials.  When OCC
>prices go south, the pickup trucks scavenging OCC disappear only to
>reappear magically overnight when prices rebound.  Likewise, UBC
prices
>dictate how zealous the scavengers are.  Since UBC prices are
relatively
>steady, the scavenging is too.  The most aggravating thing about the
>scavenging is that it leaves the dregs for the municipality to
collect
>and drives our cost per ton up.  It's a real catch 22.  I guess I
should
>be thankful that the material is being collected and sold on the open
>market and not subsidized by the city but we can't make instantaneous
>changes to our fleets and staffs to accommodate these sudden
>fluctuations.
>
>Wayne
>
>(snip, snip)

Gary Liss
916-652-7850
Fax: 916-652-0485


 


 




_______________________________
Doug Koplow
Earth Track, Inc.
2067 Massachusetts Avenue - 4th Floor
Cambridge, MA  02140
www.earthtrack.net
Tel:  617/661-4700
Fax: 617/354-0463