[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] Fwd: [USCC]White House Takes Aim at NEPA
- Subject: [GreenYes] Fwd: [USCC]White House Takes Aim at NEPA
- From: Gary Liss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:35:00 -0800
From: Jim McNelly <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:04:02 -0600
White House takes aim at NEPA
By John Krist
Friday, November 08, 2002
In his first official act of 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law.
It was a symbolically appropriate way to begin the decade: The 1970s
marked a watershed in the federal government's approach to the
environment, and NEPA did more than any other single piece of legislation
enacted during those years to fundamentally reshape the relationship
between Americans and their air, water, and land.
NEPA stands apart from many environmental statutes in another way: It has
remained almost unaltered since enactment more than three decades ago.
The Bush administration has apparently decided that is long enough.
Citing national security concerns, the administration is pressing ahead
quickly during the waning months of 2002 on proposals to "modernize
and improve" the landmark law. NEPA's defenders argue that the act
has served the nation well and needs no revision — or at least not the
kind they suspect the White House has in mind.
Passed by Congress in 1969, NEPA requires the U.S. government to assess
the environmental effect of any significant project undertaken by a
federal agency, funded with federal money, or requiring a permit from a
federal agency. It requires public disclosure of the results of that
assessment and a public determination as to whether the benefits outweigh
Those requirements seem merely prudent and unsurprising today, but 33
years ago they were revolutionary. NEPA upended the historical
relationship between Americans and the environment, requiring for the
first time that government agencies "look before they leap,"
rather than trying to ignore or reverse environmental damage after the
fact. One of its authors, Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson, called
NEPA "the most important and far-reaching conservation and
environmental measure ever enacted."
Only months after NEPA became law, the California Legislature used the
federal statute as a model for the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The state law is broader in some ways than NEPA, for it applies
even to private actions on private property if they would have a
significant environmental effect and require discretionary approval from
any government agency — federal, state, regional, or local.
CEQA will remain in effect regardless of whether federal lawmakers and
Bush Administration appointees amend NEPA. Although that will blunt the
effect of possible NEPA modifications in California, the state still has
millions of acres of national forests, national parks, and federal
offshore waters where NEPA changes could have dramatic effects.
California was not alone in emulating NEPA. Half the states — and more
than 80 countries — eventually adopted statutes requiring environmental
assessments. Attorney Nicholas Yost, who served as general counsel for
the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) during the 1970s,
has called NEPA "the most widely copied American law in all
As might be expected from laws specifically designed to slow the
permitting process and prevent some projects from going forward, NEPA and
CEQA have become lightning rods for criticism from a wide range of
interest groups. Local government officials, developers, farmers, miners,
timber companies — just about any person, business, or organization
involved in the use of natural resources — have complained about the
reach of both laws.
Whereas CEQA has been amended numerous times, NEPA remains fundamentally
unchanged, and its implementing procedures have undergone only one
substantial revision. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter ordered the CEQ to
draft regulations reducing the quantity of paperwork and length of time
involved in NEPA compliance.
The CEQ, an obscure federal body within the Executive Office of the
President, was established by NEPA. The council is charged with
promulgating NEPA regulations applicable to other federal agencies, and
with resolving disputes among federal agencies regarding NEPA compliance.
The council comprises three members appointed by the president and
subject to Senate confirmation.
The council and its staff spent months carrying out Carter's directive,
traveling the country to meet with stakeholders of every persuasion. The
CEQ asked the United States Chamber of Commerce to coordinate
participation by the business community and asked the Natural Resources
Defense Council to do the same for the environmental community. According
to Yost, CEQ staff met with labor representatives, state government
officials, federal employees, scientists, trade groups, and others.
The 18-month effort produced several notable revisions, including a time
limit on reviews, the use of public input to identify early in the
process those issues to be addressed through the environmental impact
statement (EIS), and the requirement for a "record of decision"
through which a federal agency follows completion of the EIS by producing
a public document describing in detail the action to be taken and its
The current NEPA revision process is neither so inclusive nor so
leisurely. On April 10, Horst Greczmiel, CEQ's associate director for
NEPA oversight, sent a letter to CEQ Chairman James Connaughton
requesting approval of a task force assigned to modernize the NEPA
process, citing "rapid advances in technology and information
security concerns following the events of Sept. 11, 2001."
Connaughton — a former industry lobbyist whose ties to mining companies
and the Chemical Manufacturers Association were criticized by
environmentalists during his confirmation hearing — approved the task
force, which was formed on May 20, and named Greczmiel chairman. A notice
appeared July 9 in the Federal Register announcing a 45-day public
comment period during which interested parties were invited to suggest
changes in NEPA. (The deadline was later extended to Sept. 23.)
Environmental organizations have criticized the process as another in a
series of Bush administration attempts to undermine NEPA. The critics
cite ongoing federal efforts to exempt logging plans from analysis and
public review under the guise of fire prevention, to expedite review of
some transportation projects, and to exempt federal activities from NEPA
if they occur in offshore waters.
"This is an administration that prefers to operate in secret,"
said Marty Hayden, legislative director of Earthjustice.
Connaughton denies that the task force is looking for ways to weaken
NEPA. "Our goal is to integrate NEPA practices with newer concepts
of management, such as environmental management systems and advancing
information technologies," he said in July.
Most of the specific issues on which the task force has invited
suggestions for improvement do, indeed, concern better use of technology
in analysis and communication and are unlikely to have much effect on
day-to-day implementation of the law.
Two areas of focus, however, alarm the Bush administration's critics:
expanding the use of "categorical exclusions" by which federal
agencies can declare certain types projects exempt from environmental
analysis and reviewing the "balancing of public involvement and
To environmentalists, the latter term is code for quashing public input.
And the rapid, low-profile nature of the entire process suggests the
environmentalists might have reason to worry. The CEQ task force expects
to finish its work and issue a report by the end of the year.
Environmental News Network
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]