Re: greenyes-d Digest V99 #307

B. Anderson (delta@dlcwest.com)
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:35:15 -0600


I fully agree and support this comment! This digest was totally
unnecessary as received!

>Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:41:46 -0600 (MDT)
>From: Eric S Johnson <topsoil@indra.com>
>To: greenyes@earthsystems.org
>Subject: Re: greenyes-d Digest V99 #306
>Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95q.991012213745.21417B-100000@net.indra.com>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>Regarding the 77 kilobyte attached document on the SF Environment
>Commission, I'd like to question whether it's a good use of 'net bandwidth
>or email server hard drive space (to say nothing of greenyes readers'
>time) to send attachments like this.
>
>I'd like suggest that if it's necessary to communicate with
>large files, that those wishing to do so simply post them on the web and
>refer readers to the file(s) with the proper URL?
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Eric Johnson
>topsoil@indra.com
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>End of greenyes-d Digest V99 Issue #307
>***************************************
>
>