[GRRN] good news follow-up

Veronica Torres (rontorent@surfnetusa.com)
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:39:51 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_011C_01BEB745.4ED411A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In response to Peter Anderson's posting:

"With regard to the minor residual, it is not a good idea to ignore the
fact that its utility depends upon it being separated by resin type in
order to be re-used in a paying end market (blending it into low grade
lumber is not a paying proposition). "

It is my understanding that the plastic from our recycling center is =
made into bender board. Perhaps this is not a viable option on a large =
scale, but I am grateful that it exists in my area. Since I take my =
recyclables to the center, I separate them. Mind you, the staff must =
then handle them and that does make Peter's point about "a(n) (item =
must have) sufficient size/weight to justify the sorter reaching down to =
lift it off" a valid consideration.

When I posted the response from Tom's it wasn't necessarily intended to =
rally everyone to recycle their toothpaste caps. It was intended to =
point out a company that is trying. I also was encouraged by my first =
"success" in a string of efforts to encourage manufacturers to label =
their containers. If items are not labeled, they are landfill food. =
If, and only if, the items are labeled, can anything (potentially) be =
done with them. I agree that bothering to recycle a toothpaste cap may =
not make financial sense, but I would like to have the choice and that =
choice requires labeling.

Maybe today it is not viable and to avoid Peter's prediction:

"That is to say, to pursue a purist approach of pushing the =
recycling of
virtually all plastics, even very minor fractions of the whole, will, as =
a
practical matter, force the demise of all plastics recycling, even that
larger part which can be saved."

just keep going with the programs you have in place. However, I hope =
that my efforts will result in there being a quantity of raw materials =
available when a clever person comes along with an idea for their use. =
In the meantime, we will just keep making as much bender board as is =
practical and landfill the remainder.

For a long time, I have dreamed of making a difference in this world. =
It took me a while to realize that "swinging for the seats" doesn't =
often result in a home run. Nowadays, I purposely have a very narrow =
focus. I figure that if I can just get a base hit, maybe one of you =
will send me home. =20
=20
Are there guidelines established for manufacturers who want to package =
responsibly? =20

Thank you for your consideration and comments,
Veronica Torres

------=_NextPart_000_011C_01BEB745.4ED411A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

In response to Peter Anderson's = posting:
 
"With regard to the minor residual, it is not a good = idea to=20 ignore the
fact that its utility depends upon it being separated by = resin=20 type in
order to be re-used in a paying end market (blending it into = low=20 grade
lumber is not a paying proposition).  "
 
It is my understanding that the plastic from our = recycling=20 center is made into bender board.  Perhaps this is not a viable = option on a=20 large scale, but I am grateful that it exists in my area.  Since I = take my=20 recyclables to the center, I separate them.  Mind you, the staff = must then=20 handle them and that does make Peter's point about  "a(n) (item = must have)=20 sufficient size/weight to justify the sorter reaching down to lift it = off" a=20 valid consideration.
 
When I posted the response from Tom's it wasn't = necessarily=20 intended to rally everyone to recycle their toothpaste caps.  It = was=20 intended to point out a company that is trying.  I also was=20 encouraged by my first "success" in a string of efforts to = encourage=20 manufacturers to label their containers.  If items are not labeled, = they=20 are landfill food.  If, and only if, the items are labeled, = can=20 anything (potentially) be done with them.  I agree that bothering = to=20 recycle a toothpaste cap may not make financial sense, but I would like = to have=20 the choice and that choice requires labeling.
 
Maybe today it is not viable and to avoid Peter's=20 prediction:

    "That is to say, to pursue a = purist=20 approach of pushing the recycling of
virtually all plastics, even = very minor=20 fractions of the whole, will, as a
practical matter, force the demise = of all=20 plastics recycling, even that
larger part which can be = saved."
 
just keep going with the programs you have in = place. =20 However, I hope that my efforts will result in there being a quantity of = raw=20 materials available when a clever person comes along with an idea for = their=20 use.  In the meantime, we will just keep making as much bender = board as is=20 practical and landfill the remainder.
 
For a long time, I have dreamed of making = a difference in=20 this world.  It took me a while to realize that "swinging for the = seats"=20 doesn't often result in a home run.  Nowadays, I purposely have a = very=20 narrow focus.  I figure that if I can just get a base = hit, maybe=20 one of you will send me home.  
 
Are there guidelines established for manufacturers = who want to=20 package responsibly? 
 
Thank you for your consideration and = comments,
Veronica Torres
------=_NextPart_000_011C_01BEB745.4ED411A0--