[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
The issue is that this is viewed by
some as a subsidy to the operators of CAFOs [factory farms] to allow them to
continue to pollute the air and water via their retention ponds and field
spraying run off in the name of energy production. Surely there may be
environmental benefits to systems which are totally sealed, but most as proposed
are only partially contained at best....similar to the landfill efficiency issue
with methane.
Pete Pasterz. From: GreenYes@no.address [mailto:GreenYes@no.address] On Behalf Of Mark Snyder Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:59 PM To: GreenYes@no.address Subject: [html][bayes][heur] [GreenYes] Re: House Passes Federal Renewable Electricity Standard Importance: Low I'm presuming that the "gasification of animal waste" was included so that
anaerobic manure digestion could be included. What exactly would be wrong with
that?
There are a number of organizations that have done some great work with
anaerobic digester projects, including Native Energy - see the various methane
projects listed at http://www.nativeenergy.com/projects.html and
the Minnesota Project - see http://www.mnproject.org/e-biogas.html
Mark Snyder
Minneapolis, MN
On 8/8/07, Dave
Ciplet <dave@no.address>
wrote:
|
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]