[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Brenda Platt at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (_bplatt@no.address (mailto:bplatt@no.address) ) in part writes": Hi all, Is anyone looking at the impact that this will have in encouraging biodegradable plastic bags? I have been focusing most of my time the last year on bioplastic issues and I do not support the use of biodegradable plastic bags for shopping bags, only for collecting organics destined for composting facilities. Biodegradable bags are not even close to being 100% biobased. Further, all the biodegradable bags I know of are only biodegradable in commercially operated compost facilities, not for instance, in the marine environment. The per bag fee being proposed should apply to ALL single-use shopping bags in order to promote reusable bags. Let's not encourage single-use biodegradable plastic bags. BTW, the biodegradable petro-based co-polyester resin frequently used in these bags is made by the big German chemical giant, BASF. Let's be careful about what we are supporting. Also, coming down the pike is biodegradable PVC products. Just because a bag is biodegradable does not mean it is environmentally sound. Do we care about the impact on recycling film plastics? I'd be interested in a dialogue specifically on this issue. Biodegradable bags will become a contaminant in film recycling. I'm no fan of petro-plastics and petro bags. But I think this is a concern from a recycling perspective. While I am still in the process of researching biodegradable bags, here?s some preliminary findings by bag company. First, a definition of biodegradability I wrote: Biodegradable plastics are plastics that can decompose into carbon dioxide, methane, water, inorganic compounds, or biomass via microbial assimilation (the enzymatic action of microorganism). To be considered biodegradable, this decomposition has to be measured by standardized tests, and take place within a specified period time, which vary according to the ?disposal? method chosen. The American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) has created definitions on what constitutes biodegradability in various disposal environments. Plastics that meet ASTM D6400, for instance, can be certified as biodegradable and compostable in commercial composting facilities. In Europe the equivalent standardized test criteria is _EN 13432_ (http://www.european-bioplastics.org/index.php?id=158) . In the US, there is a biodegradability standard for soil (ASTM D5988), a biodegradability test standard for marine and fresh water (ASTM D6692 and D6691), one for wastewater treatment facilities (ASTM D5271), and one for anaerobic digestion (ASTM D 5511). Other countries have similar standards and certifications. Belgium is unique in offering ?The OK Compost? mark, which guarantees that the product can be composted in home composting systems. While many bioplastics are indeed certifiable as compostable in commercial compost facilities, not all can be home composted and not all are biodegradable in the marine environment. Furthermore, a number of petrochemical-based polymers are certified biodegradable and compostable. Biodegradability is a directly linked to the chemical structure, not to the origin of the raw materials. Eco Film: No biobased content at all. Eco Works: Can contain between 5-70% corn based resin (5-70% biobased content, most collection bags are on the low end) Mater-bi (BioBag): Blend of petro-derived polyester and starch (the starch may or may not be from corn and the biobased content is around 20-30%, remaining 70-80% is petro-derived) Cereplast: Uses a blend of petroleum-based polyester, possibly some small PLA amounts and possibly other materials. Not sure about biobasd content, but one industry rep (not with Cereplast) told me that he believes their bags are ? more than likely 70-100% petroleum derived.? [Cereplast also uses nanocomposites, which I have a huge problem with. Any community embraces the precautionary principle should not be promoting products with nanoparticles.] Bio-Tuf/Heritage: Blend of polyester and calcium carbonate filler. Don?t believe they claim any biobased content at all. Petro-derived polyester is likely 85% of the formulation, but don?t know precise. Mater-bi (BioSak); Blend of polyester and corn-based starch. They're in the same range of biobased content (20-30% biobased. 70-80% petro-derived). All of the above bags are certified compostable, but none are petroleum-free. Nearly all are a vast majority petroleum-derived content. Best, Brenda Brenda Platt Institute for Local Self-Reliance 927 15th Street, NW, 4th Fl Washington, DC 20005 tel: 202-898-1610 ext. 230 fax: 202-898-1612 _bplatt@no.address (mailto:bplatt@no.address) _http://www.ilsr.org_ (http://www.ilsr.org/) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]