[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Apologies for Cross-Postings >From: "Bill Sheehan" <bill@no.address> >To: "Product Policy Institute" <info@no.address> >Subject: PPI Update: California adopts >strongest EPR position in U.S.- Feb2007 >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:53:18 -0500 > >The Product Policy Institute welcomes the adoption >by a California waste agency of the strongest >language yet in the U.S. supporting Extended >Producer Responsibility. > >On February 13, 2007, the California Integrated >Waste Management Board adopted Strategic >Directive 5 on Producer Responsibility. The >directive embraces producer responsibility as a core >value of the agency?s mission. It directs the agency >to ?seek statutory authority to foster cradle to cradle >producer responsibility? and to "develop and >maintain relationship with station stakeholders that >result in producer financed and producer managed >systems for product as guards." (Full text below) > >The new strategic directive has received strong >support from local governments in California, >particularly since a statewide disposal ban went >into effect a year ago banning fluorescent lamps, >household batteries and many other common >household electronic products from the trash. > >"The cost of collecting and properly disposing or >recycling these products easily exceeds >$100 million a year,? observed Carol Misseldine, >Director of the California Product Stewardship >Council. ?The companies that make money by >selling toxic products need to be part of the >solution; local governments do not have the >resources or capacity to manage toxic products >effectively, nor should they." > >The California Product Stewardship Council >was formed in response to the hazardous products >ban. Members are local governments from all over >California. Its mission is: > ?To shift California?s product waste management > system from one focused on government funded > and ratepayer financed waste diversion to one > that relies on producer responsibility in order > to reduce public costs and drive improvements > in product design that promote environmental > sustainability.? >As a result of the Council?s efforts, six jurisdictions >in California, including San Francisco and Oakland, >have passed Extended Producer Responsibility >Resolutions calling for statewide policies. > >?Adopting the directive establishes California as a >leader in the growing international movement for >Extended Producer Responsibility,? said Bill >Sheehan, Executive Director of the Athens, >Georgia-based Product Policy Institute. >?Implementing policies and laws based on the >principle of producer responsibility for cradle-to- >cradle management of products and packaging will >harness market forces to transform wasteful >systems of production and consumption.? > >The following documents have recently been added >to PPI web site at ><http://www.productpolicy.org/resources/index.html>http://www.productpolicy.org/resources/index.html: > ? California Strategic Directive on Producer > Responsibility > ? PPI support document (Feb2007) > ? California Product Stewardship Council: > 1-Year Media Release > >PPI also announces a new Issue Brief, posted at the >same site: > ? Purchasing Best Practices: Contracting for >Producer Responsibility, by Green Purchasing >Institute for PPI (Jan2007) > >Product Policy Institute has been assisting the >California Product Stewardship Council (CPSC). >Product Policy Institute is an independent nonprofit >research and education organization addressing >product-focused public policies that advance >sustainable production and consumption and good >governance. > >Contact: > >************************************* >Bill Sheehan, Executive Director >Product Policy Institute >P.O. Box 48433 >Athens, GA 30604 USA >Tel: 706-613-0710 >Email: <mailto:bill@no.address>bill@no.address >Web: <http://www.productpolicy.org/>www.productpolicy.org >************************************* > > >California Integrated Waste Management Board >Strategic Directive-5: PRODUCER >RESPONSIBILITY > >It is a core value of the CIWMB that producers >assume the responsibility for the safe stewardship >of their materials in order to promote environmental >sustainability. Specifically, the CIWMB will: > >1. Utilize existing Board authority to foster >?cradle-to-cradle? producer responsibility. > >2. Seek statutory authority to foster ?cradle-to- >cradle? producer responsibility. > >3. Analyze the feasibility of various approaches to >increasing producer responsibility, including during >the product design and packaging phases, and make >recommendations to the CIWMB Board >by December 2007, and annually thereafter. > >4. Build capacity and knowledge in CIWMB on >Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) issues and >solutions. > >5. Develop and maintain relationships with >stakeholders that result in producer-financed and >producer-managed systems for product discards. > >### > > Gary Liss 916-652-7850 Fax: 916-652-0485 www.garyliss.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]