GreenYes Archives

[GreenYes Archives] - [Thread Index] - [Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]

[GreenYes] Re: Which Types of Products are the Worst for the Environment?

Interesting reading, maybe I'll buy the full article. The question I
have based on the abstracts is whether they have measured gross harm
without subtracting net benefit (standard of living, human health,

I'd like to see a measure that focuses on jewelry (45% of all toxics
released by all USA Industry comes from hard rock metal mining; most
mercury sold today goes to 3rd world gold mining operations, which burn
it off into the air) and other products which are an anachronism. Gold
in the past represented a form of savings, but just as most governments
dropped the gold standard a hundred years ago, most people would find
that paying down their credit cards and buying a cheap 9k cosmetic
jewelry item would make them better off. The environmental cost of
heavy metal mining is ridiculous. Material worth $600 per ounce pays
for deep roads into the rain forest, deep holes in the ground, and
other environmental costs.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group.
To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address
For more options, visit this group at

[GreenYes Archives] - [Date Index] - [Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]