[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
At 10:52 AM 7/8/2006 -0700, you wrote: >I am asking the group for the thoughts and ideas on the best way to >handle sewage sludge, have been reading how Toronto can't ship there >sludge to the USA landfill after Aug. 1st. so please send your thoughs >and ideas on the best way to handle sewage sludge from Canada and the >USA. Thanks Keith I don't think there is a "one size fits all" answer to this question. The most common means of large-scale sludge disposal are dumping (landfilling), various forms of "land application," and incineration. Sludge is full of useful nutrients. But it can also have levels of metals and chemical toxins that make it inappropriate for use as a soil amendment/fertilizer. Or, at least, limit such use. Infectious agents (bacteria, viruses....) are also of concern. The sensible thing to do is to "close the loop" by managing the quality of the sludge, by keeping metals and other toxins out of the sewer system. The "beneficial reuse" thing has to be looked at carefully. For example, in my city/county (Wilmington, Delaware) sludge is mixed with coal ash. By magic, mixing two undesirable things creates something good. The mixture passes some tests related to leaching of constituents, but of course the metals are still there. Since nobody actually wants the stuff, it is dumped illegally at a supposedly-closed landfill under the pretext of landscaping. It is a scam, but it works because the utility (Conectiv Energy) and the City together have more political power than regulatory agencies have integrity. Milwaukee, since 1925, has been selling it's sludge as fertilizer (Millorganite). It is sold to homeowners as OK for vegetable gardens and suchlike. (<http:///>http://www.milorganite<http:///>.com Take a look at the history page and the MSDS.). Note this data on Millorganite from the state of Washington (http://agr.wa.gov/PestFert/Fertilizers/ProductDatabase.htm ) Arsenic 7.2 Cadmium 6.1 Cobalt 5.4 Mercury 2.7 Molybdenum 15 Nickel 40 Lead 120 Selenium 5.8 Zinc 760 This article, "Sewage Sludge, Pros & Cons," (http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Sewage-Sludge-Pros-Cons.htm) (Environ. Sci. Technol. A-Pages; 2000; 34(19); but not available there without a password) is interesting. "When it comes to spreading sludge on agricultural land, the United States has the most relaxed standards for metals among developed nations." Incineration seems obviously undesirable. Is it better to concentrate the contamination in one place (a landfill) or dilute it by spreading it all around, creating a lower-level hazard for more people? I think the only reasonable answer is to clean up the sewer systems themselves, but eliminating discharges into them that contaminate the sludge, and flushing out the residual contamination. But this is no small project for old cities. Alan Muller Alan Muller, Executive Director Green Delaware Box 69 Port Penn, DE 19731 USA (302)834-3466 fax (302)836-3005 greendel@no.address www.greendel.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]