[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Dear Eric, I have great respect for you, but I'm afraid I have to disagree with the "wait and see" approach. Now is the time to ask questions about the PLA bottle, if it is not already too late. There's a big difference between criticizing a product or process, and asking hard questions about the potential environmental and economic impacts of that product or process. This is not the time to put a halt to questions that many people have about the bioplastics industry in general and the PLA bottle in particular. I hope members of this listserv will continue to seek answers to their questions. The PLA bottle could have a profound impact on both our environment and our economy. Pat **************************************** Patricia Franklin Executive Director Container Recycling Institute 1776 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036-1904 Tel.(202) 263-0999 Fax: (202) 263-0949 www.container-recycling.org and www.bottlebill.org -----Original Message----- From: GreenYes@no.address [mailto:GreenYes@no.address]On Behalf Of Alan Muller Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:39 AM To: Eric Lombardi; GreenYes@no.address Subject: [GreenYes] Re: Eco-Cycle support for bioplastics At 02:04 PM 2/14/2006 -0700, Eric Lombardi wrote: Dear GreenYessers, The real reason I?m writing this is to ask you all, and your networks, to give the bioplastics industry some time to d velop before we criticize them too heavily. [...] The piece below is interesting (not great), and says that we need to be more supportive of Big Corporate Small Steps. Well, maybe? but in the case of NW, they took a big step in building that Nebraska PLA production facility ($300 million, or something like that). Their product isn?t perfect, but I?m convinced it?s a good step toward a carbohydrate economy. This is a tough issue, philosophically and practically. As someone who has been a corporate greenwasher as well as an on-the-edge activist (at least by Delaware standards) I think activists are often in a no-win situation. How can one distinguish the greenwashing motivation from the experimenting-with-change-motivation. Does it matter? With "business" reporters usually regurgitating corporate press releases, doesn't somebody need to inject a cautionary note? But we don't want to be perceived as the "oppose everything" people.... Do we gain or lose influence by taking a position? Sometimes the best thing to say is nothing. I personally feel the US agricultural system is so profoundly unsustainable that it's hard to get excited about bio-fuels and bio-polymers. If there is a significant market segment for crops that don't have to make a pretence of being edible by man or beast, with practices get even worse......? Alan Alan Muller, Executive Director Green Delaware Box 69 Port Penn, DE 19731 USA (302)834-3466 fax (302)836-3005 greendel@no.address www.greendel.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreenYes" group. To post to this group, send email to GreenYes@no.address To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GreenYes-unsubscribe@no.address For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GreenYes -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]