[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
I do NOT include a fuel usage increase in my contracts, for several reasons. 1. Fuel is a small percentage of the total costs of doing business...typically less than 7% for a hauling operation. Personnel, employee benefits, capital costs of trucks and buildings, O & M on trucks, Workers Comp, company profits, etc etc etc are vastly more by percentage, in determination of "costs." Health costs, for example, have increased by 50 - 60% in some places, but I don't hear about a "health cost escalation clause" in any contracts! (and no, I won't put that in either!) 2. An automatic fuel escalator provides no incentive for companies, or cities like mine, to become more efficient in our routing, purchase vehicles with increased efficiencies, or work on other economies in our operation. 3. I often hear pleas for fuel escalators, but have yet to see language in such escalators that bring the costs DOWN as the fuel costs come down. For instance, fuel around here is "down to" 2.39. If I was paying the escalator from the 2.99 days.....would a company let me know that they didn't need that rate any more? 4. As we blithely pay fuel escalators, and pass them on to our customers, we can more easily forget that several oil companies are posting record profits, paying record dividends to their shareholders, and have record amounts of Proven Reserves in the lower 48. Occidental Petroleum, for example, announced a 16% dividend increase on 10/13/05, a dividend rate 44% higher than in 2002. The last time oil companies posted such profit increases during oil shortages with high prices, there were investigations into Obscene Profits....I've heard nothing lately. In fact, the last Energy Bill passed by Congress provides drilling incentives to these "strapped" operations. I have listened for good reasons to include escalators in contracts, and will continue to do so.....but I have yet to hear any truly Good Reasons. Susan Young, Director Minneapolis Solid Waste and Recycling Services -----Original Message----- From: Blair Pollock [mailto:bpollock@no.address] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 1:40 PM To: greenyes@no.address Subject: [greenyes] In Search of Sample contract langauge for fuel escalationclauses Hello: We could use some help from anyone who has contract language on a fuel escalation clause, in our case it's for curbside recycling but certainly an obvious necessity in this day & age for any hauling, but not sure how to proceed. You can post the langauge you have to the digest or send directly to me: I appreciate it. If everyone in Orange County recycled two more aluminum cans a week we would recycle over twelve million more cans a year.__________________________________________________ Blair Pollock Solid Waste Planner (919) 968-2788 fax: (919) 932-2900 PO Box 17177 Chapel Hill, NC 27516-7177 |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]