[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
The Clarion-Ledger¹s (Jackson, Mississippi) article has really made the rounds. It, along with a piece in the good old National Review stimulated a nice synopsis at Salon.com on Friday <">">http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_ro om/2005/09/16/enviro/index.html> <http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2 005/09/16/enviro/index.html> <http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2 005/09/16/enviro/index.html> Not sure non-members can access though. If not, you might try my blog, <http://blueolives.blogspot.com/>. I did a write up this weekend on some of the stuff I¹ve come across along these same lines. There¹s a John McPhee excerpt published in the New Yorker that I point to. db on 9/16/05 9:05 PM, amy perlmutter at amyperl@no.address wrote: > anyone know where the clarion-ledger is based? > > E-mail Suggests Government Seeking to Blame Groups > By Jerry Mitchell > The Clarion-Ledger > > Friday 16 September 2005 > > Federal officials appear to be seeking proof to blame the flood of New > Orleans on environmental groups, documents show. > > The Clarion-Ledger has obtained a copy of an internal e-mail the US > Department of Justice sent out this week to various US attorneys' offices: > "Has your district defended any cases on behalf of the (US) Army Corps of > Engineers against claims brought by environmental groups seeking to block or > otherwise impede the Corps work on the levees protecting New Orleans? If so, > please describe the case and the outcome of the litigation." > > Cynthia Magnuson, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, said Thursday > she couldn't comment "because it's an internal e-mail." > > Shown a copy of the e-mail, David Bookbinder, senior attorney for Sierra > Club, remarked, "Why are they (Bush administration officials) trying to smear > us like this?" > > The Sierra Club and other environmental groups had nothing to do with the > flooding that resulted from Hurricane Katrina that killed hundreds, he said. > "It's unfortunate that the Bush administration is trying to shift the blame to > environmental groups. It doesn't surprise me at all." > > Federal officials say the e-mail was prompted by a congressional inquiry > but wouldn't comment further. > > Whoever is behind the e-mail may have spotted the Sept. 8 issue of > National Review Online that chastised the Sierra Club and other environmental > groups for suing to halt the corps' 1996 plan to raise and fortify 303 miles > of Mississippi River levees in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas. > > The corps settled the litigation in 1997, agreeing to hold off on some > work until an environmental impact could be completed. The National Review > article concluded: "Whether this delay directly affected the levees that broke > in New Orleans is difficult to ascertain." > > The problem with that conclusion? > > The levees that broke causing New Orleans to flood weren't Mississippi > River levees. They were levees that protected the city from Lake Pontchartrain > levees on the other side of the city. > > When Katrina struck, the hurricane pushed tons of water from the Gulf of > Mexico into Lake Pontchartrain, which borders the city to the north. Corps > officials say the water from the lake cleared the levees by 3 feet. It was > those floodwaters, they say, that caused the levees to degrade until they > ruptured, causing 80 percent of New Orleans to flood. > > Bookbinder said the purpose of the litigation by the Sierra Club and > others in 1996 was where the corps got the dirt for the project. "We had no > objections to levees," he said. "We said, 'Just don't dig film materials out > of the wetlands. Get the dirt from somewhere else.'" > > If you listen to what some conservatives say about environmentalists, he > said, "We're responsible for most of the world's ills." > > In 1977, the corps wanted to build a 25-mile-long barrier and gate system > to protect New Orleans on the east side. Both environmental groups and > fishermen opposed the project, saying it would choke off water into Lake > Pontchartrain. > > After litigation, corps officials abandoned the idea, deciding instead to > build higher levees. "They came up with a cheaper alternative," Bookbinder > said. "We didn't object to raising the levees." > > John Hall, a spokesman for the corps in New Orleans, said the barrier the > corps was proposing in the 1970s would only stand up to a weak Category 3 > hurricane, not a Category 4 hurricane like Katrina. "How much that would have > prevented anything, I'm not sure," he said. > > Since 1999, corps officials have studied the concept of building huge > floodgates to prevent flooding in New Orleans from a Category 4 or 5 > hurricane. > > Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2001 listed a > hurricane striking New Orleans as one of the top three catastrophic events the > nation could face (the others being a terrorist attack on New York City and an > earthquake in San Francisco), funding for corps projects aimed at curbing > flooding in southeast Louisiana lagged. > > US Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-LA, has said the White House cut $400 million > from corps' requests for flood control money in the area. > > In fiscal 2006, the corps had hoped to receive up to $10 million in > funding for a six-year feasibility study on such floodgates. According to a > recent estimate, the project would take 10 years to build and cost $2.5 > billion. > > "Our understanding is the locals would like to go to that," Hall said. "If > I were local, I'd want it." David Biddle, Executive Director P.O. Box 4037 Philadelphia, PA 19118 215-247-3090 215-432-8225 (mobile) Dbiddle@no.address <WWW.GPCRC.COM> Read In Business magazine to learn about sustainable businesses in communities across North America! Go to: <http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/jgpress/> |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]