[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[Putting aside the substance of whether nuclear power is necessary to "tackle global warming," I think we need to look at the broader dynamic in which Mr. Blair, aligning himself, sideways, with Mr. Bush, is drawing a line in the sand barring any action today to avert climatic disruption, no matter how necessary, that would change "living standards." Also put aside some of the Amory Lovins similiar pitches from the left that the conservation way out of the energy crunch is similarly cost free. I don't know whether there is a "solution" that is, net, cost free or not. Probably no one does, or can know something like that. What I believe to be more overarchingly important is, however, just like Mr. Bush's response to how American's should sacrifice after September 11th, by going shopping, is that those necessary actions to protect our future are off the table without any apparent regard to the real world exigencies we face. That is to say, the issue is premature foreclosure of responses that may very turn out to be necessary. Imagine if that had been our response to Hitler's invasion of the Netherlands, instead of the immediate huckering down with rationing and all that which America of that day proudly adopted. What has happened to us as a people? Suppose the reality is that there is a cost, and, heaven forbid, we had to reduce our household standard of living, say, 20% -- which may be how we all lived, perfectly well mind you, in 1975 (guessing) -- would that really be all that horrible as, in the bigger scheme of things, doing what we have to do to preserve a world worth living for those who follow us. -- peter] Blair demands nuclear power to protect high 'living standards' By Marie Woolf, Chief Political Correspondent 09 May 2005 Tony Blair has ruled out making changes to "living standards" to tackle global warming, and is drawing up plans to build a new generation of nuclear power stations to reduce carbon dioxide emissions instead. The Prime Minister has personally endorsed "keeping the nuclear option open" and is planning a government statement on a change of policy before the summer, in the face of opposition from cabinet ministers, including Margaret Beckett, the Secretary of State for the Environment. Mr Blair's decision to revive the nuclear agenda was revealed two weeks ago by The Independent which reported that Mr Blair's own strategy unit was working on it. "... "... "... "... "..." FOR FULL ARTICLE: http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=636853&host=3&dir=58 _________________________ Peter Anderson, President RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING 4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15 Madison, WI 53705-4964 Ph: (608) 231-1100 Fax: (608) 233-0011 Cell: (608) 698-1314 eMail: anderson@no.address web: www.recycleworlds.net CONFIDENTIAL This message, and all attachments thereto, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C., Sections 2510-2521. This message is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify me if you received this message in error at anderson@no.address and then delete it. |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]