RE: [greenyes] JP Morgan Goes "Green" - Power of Activists

[mwilcox@no.address (Meg Wilcox)]

JP Morgan's decision has everything to do with pressure exerted by the
Investor Network on Climate Risk. For more info, see
http://www.ceres.org/investorprograms/shareholder_action.php
JP Morgan shareholders wouldn't be aware of global warming risks without
the work of the INCR.  Do you really think the WSJ would give green
groups credit if this weren't true?


Meg Wilcox
NEWMOA
129 Portland Street, Suite 602
Boston, MA  02114-2014
Tel 617-367-8558 X305
Fax 617-367-0449
mwilcox@no.address
www.newmoa.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Koplow [mailto:koplow@no.address] 
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 1:32 PM
To: greenyes@no.address; anderson@no.address
Subject: Re: [greenyes] JP Morgan Goes "Green" - Power of Activists

My reading of this is that JP Morgan's decision has nothing to do with
environmental group pressure and everything to do with better control of
the risks associated with their investments.  

With Kyoto in effect, factors such as carbon emissions (and their
control or the purchase of emissions rights) already have real financial
effects in many countries.  For long-term investments, such as a
coal-fired power plant for example, failure to integrate these costs
into plant economics (and lending assumptions) would be a rather
substantial mistake.  It is probably not a coincidence that we are
starting to see changes in bank policies now.

Whether the other changes in JP Morgan's lending criteria represent true
successes of environmental and shareholder pressure as the WSJ implies,
rather than PR-oriented changes with far less bit than GHG costing, will
depend on the details of their 10-page policy soon to be released.  If
others on the list read it through, I'd be interested in hearing your
verdicts.   

-Doug Koplow

_______________________________
Doug Koplow
Earth Track, Inc.
2067 Massachusetts Avenue - 4th Floor
Cambridge, MA  02140
www.earthtrack.net
Tel:  617/661-4700
Fax: 617/354-0463

           CONFIDENTIAL
This message, and all attachments thereto, is for the designated
recipient
only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private 
information.  If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.

>>> "Peter Anderson" <anderson@no.address> 04/25/05 12:35PM >>>
[With the total blackout from power in Congress and the White House, it
is 
good to see how concerted organized action can still produce solid 
constructive results for change, a fact which shows how out of phase the

current occupants in power are from the people.  JP Morgan would not
change 
its stripes for activists had they not perceived it as necessary to be a

viable player in the marketplace.- Peter]




WALL STREET JOURNAL

J.P. Morgan
Adopts 'Green'
Lending Policies
By JIM CARLTON
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
April 25, 2005

Following pressure by ecological activists and shareholder groups, J.P. 
Morgan Chase & Co. will adopt sweeping guidelines that restrict its
lending 
and underwriting practices for industrial projects that are likely to
have 
an environmental impact.
The New York banking giant -- third largest in assets in the U.S. -- is 
expected to issue a 10-page environmental policy today that takes an 
aggressive stance on global warming, including tying carbon-dioxide 
emissions to its loan-review process for power plants and other large 
polluters. The bank also plans to calculate in loan reviews the
financial 
cost of greenhouse-gas emissions, such as the risk of a company losing 
business to a competitor with lower emissions because it has a better
public 
standing.
And J.P. Morgan plans to lobby the U.S. government to adopt a national 
policy on greenhouse-gas emissions, becoming the first big American bank
to 
pledge that kind of activism on such a contentious issue, according to 
shareholder activists.
The bank's move, on the heels of activist campaigns that produced
similar 
pledges from Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., suggest that a
shift 
in tactics by the environmental movement is paying off. Green groups
have 
largely failed in efforts to lobby the Bush administration on oil
drilling 
and other issues. So they are pressuring corporations directly, hoping
to 
counter business activity that could harm the environment.
Large banks are a particularly important target because of their
potential 
role in financing activity such as energy development and logging. By 
agreeing to put some limits on lending, banks could forgo some
profitable 
activity. But activists argue that eco-friendly policies can help banks 
sidestep loan defaults and costly litigation associated with businesses
such 
as logging and mining.
"This is increasingly becoming the way all banks operate," says Steve 
Lippman, vice president of social research at Trillium Asset Management,
a 
socially oriented investment firm based in Boston that helped lobby J.P.

Morgan. "J.P. Morgan is now raising the bar for the sector."
"...
"...
"...
"..."

FOR FULL ARTICLE. 
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/0,,SB111438883473915625,00.html 
_________________________
Peter Anderson, President
RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING
4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15
Madison, WI 53705-4964
Ph: (608) 231-1100
Fax: (608) 233-0011
Cell: (608) 698-1314
eMail: anderson@no.address 
web: www.recycleworlds.net 

         CONFIDENTIAL
This message, and all attachments thereto,
is covered by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C., Sections 2510-2521.
This message is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message,
then any retention, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. Please notify me if you received
this message in error at anderson@no.address 
and then delete it.