RE: [greenyes] Global Warming - The Hockey Stick & The Risks of Overstatement

["Steve Bloom" <spbloom@no.address>]

	Dan, I have a feeling you're an audience of one on this list in terms of any need to see
proof of the Wall Street Journal's bias on global warming, but here's one last bit of
information:  http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1978.  I hope it doesn't shake up your
world view too much, but note that the WSJ is lumped together with the New York Times,
which I guess would make the WSJ socialist.
	-- Steve Bloom

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Weisenbach [mailto:dan@no.address]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 4:22 PM
To: greenyes@no.address
Subject: RE: [greenyes] Global Warming - The Hockey Stick & The Risks of Overstatement


I much prefer the "corporate agenda" of the Wall Street Journal with their accurate,
in-depth, and honest reporting; as opposed to the socialist agenda of The New York Times
and the Boston Globe; or the outright communist leanings of Grist.

Dan Weisenbach, Caring Capitalist

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:07:15 -0800, Steve Bloom wrote:
> Bear in mind the Wall Street Journal's political agenda.  Global
> warming is bad for corporate profits, so best just to ignore it for
> as long as possible, eh?