[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
The interchange about decomposition in landfills misses THE major issue. That is the point in time when the final cover, which is installed on top of the landfill upon closure, will, according to EPA, "eventually fail." When it does, most likely between 10 and 20 years after the end of the 30 year post-closure period, rainfall and snow melt will reenter the site, reigniting a second wave of decomposition with its new loads, now uncontrolled, of leachate and gas generation. Until that happens, Rathje et al. have a point about the absence of water causing decomposition to slow down in regions of the waste load where liquids entrained in the incoming waste had not concentrated or pooled or where lignin is present. But, that statement by itself, without acknowledgement about the impending failure of the cap, constitutes a major distortion of the facts necessary to understand the processes involved. This is the reason why the current generation of landfills are widely considered to be fatally flawed. Thus, the fact that recycling has not, in general, been able to compete against $20/ton landfills does not imply that diversion not making economic sense. Rather it reflects the fact that regulatory process has been subverted to avoid necessary safety measures for the sole purpose of keeping disposal appearing to look like it has been less costly than recovery. It is not. Peter ______________________________ Peter Anderson RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING Corp 4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15 Madison, WI 53705 Ph: (608) 231-1100 Fax: (608) 233-0011 Cell (608) 438-9062 email: anderson@no.address |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]