[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
Might I also add, that the added tax would only apply to People Who Choose to Consume Beverages in Single-Use Container! Not that long ago, parents sent their kids to school with a thermous full of milk or juice and they drank water when they came home. Camille Armantrout Pat Franklin <pfranklin@no.address> wrote: Albany Times Union Editorial Tuesday, February 24, 2004 Expand the bottle law >snip< A much weaker argument against an expanded bottle bill is that it would be a new tax on consumers, or, as come industry critics claim, a "children's tax" because it would fall heavily on the beverages consumed by the young. But a deposit is not a tax. It becomes one only if the consumer chooses not to seek a refund. Then and only then. |
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]