[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] Fw: mandatory separation question
- Subject: [GreenYes] Fw: mandatory separation question
- From: "Bill Sheehan" <zerowaste@grrn.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:14:41 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Tangri" <ntangri@essential.org>
To: "Bill Sheehan" <zerowaste@grrn.org>
Cc: "Mariana Boy Tamborrell"
<ntangri@essential.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:07 PM
Subject: separation question
Can you forward this to your network please? It's from an ally in Mexico
who's dealing with a number of waste-related laws currently before the
Congress there. She wants to know our thoughts on one piece of one
of these bills:
Article 48:
The separation of municipal waste is mandatory and must be in accordance
with its character:
I. Organics: all solid, biodegradable wastes;
II. Inorganics:
a) recyclabes:
i) glass
ii) paper and cardboard
iii) plastics
iv) laminates of recyclable materials; and
v) aluminum and non-hazardous metals
b) domestic sanitary waste [this refers to diapers, tampons, etc. I believe]
c) other wastes not falling under "special management" [this would be a
separate clause referring to hazwaste, etc.]
Does this make sense as a regulatory scheme?
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]