[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
RE: [GreenYes] Curbside Collection of Glass
- Subject: RE: [GreenYes] Curbside Collection of Glass
- From: "Stephen N Weisser" <steve1092@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:13:22 -0500
VERY good points! agree!
----
http://www.greenpartylancasterpa.org
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-greenyes@grrn.org [mailto:owner-greenyes@grrn.org]On Behalf
Of Jeff Morris
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:17 PM
To: greenyes@grrn.org
Subject: [GreenYes] Curbside Collection of Glass
I hope and pray every one on this list really read
and understood Bob Kirby's message regarding
collecting glass through curbside recycling
programs. I'd like to support what he wrote with a
few observations of my own.
(1) I'm wont to say that curbside is mass transit
for recyclables whenever I hear about schemes for
using drop off to collect materials from households
and businesses. To me that captures the essence of
the savings in pollutant emissions from hauling
discards around. It should be obvious that it's a
bad idea to throw glass off the recycling bus and
into a multitude of individual cars, SUVs and pickup
trucks.
(2) It costs something to collect glass in the
garbage truck just like it does to collect glass on
the recycling truck. As we get closer and closer to
zero waste, that cost of adding glass back into the
garbage collection system gets to be a bigger and
bigger percentage of garbage collection costs. We've
got glass out of the garbage now, why put it back in
there and then realize down the road how much we
could reduce volume and cost on the garbage truck by
taking it out again?
(3) Based on just the 27 pollutants covered by EPA's
Decision Support Tool for Municipal Solid Waste
Management, and on the range of cost estimates for
those pollutants that have been developed and
reported in the literature, the upstream benefits of
using recycled glass instead of virgin materials
(e.g., glass sand) to manufacture new glass
containers is in the range $18 to $68 per ton. These
costs are not currently incorporated in the direct
costs of using virgin materials. Rather they
are "externalized" onto society at large and the
future. But they are real costs paid by someone,
nonetheless, and so we ought to take them into
account before we decide that recycling glass is not
worth the costs we pay to do it.
(4) The costs of pollutants reflected in the $18 to
$68 per ton figures above are in large part the
costs to human health from breathing or ingesting
those 27 pollutants in our air and water. They do
not reflect at all the costs to other species and to
ecosystems (or natural capital as some like to say)
of digging and drilling in the earth and the oceans
to extract virgin mineral resources to manufacture
new glass containers(or plastic or metal, for that
matter). In a the-present-only-counts, humans-with-
money-only-count, bottom-line-driven market system,
these other kinds of costs don't matter so much. But
I would hope that we all understand these other
kinds of costs are precisely why we recycle instead
of waste, and why we press for societal responses to
temper and reign in the excesses and ignorance of
the unbridled marketplace.
(5) Bob Kirby's and other folks' work in developing
lower value added markets for recycled glass is
important in supporting and enriching and
diversifying the glass recycling infrastructure. It
helps make closed loop recycling of glass containers
into glass containers more efficient. It does not
replace or undermine closed loop recycling, and the
existence of lower value added markets should not be
used as an excuse for giving up on curbside
collection of glass, even in those places which do
not have access to higher value added markets. Even
the use of recycled glass as a substitute for gravel
or other aggregates reduces the acquisition of those
virgin aggregate materials from our ecosystems.
*******************
It's good to ask hard questions about recycling, but
it's not so smart to accept answers that accentuate
the short-term, internalized-cost-centric bottom
line and mostly disregard long-term sustainability.
Thanks for the opportunity to give a long answer
here!!!
Jeff
Dr. Jeffrey Morris
Sound Resource Management - Bellingham Office
112 Ohio Street, Suite 202
Bellingham, WA 98225
360-738-0255
360-738-0256 fax
www.soundresource.com or www.zerowaste.com
jeff.morris@zerowaste.com
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]