[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] American Companies Oppose EU's "Green" Consumption Proposals
- Subject: [GreenYes] American Companies Oppose EU's "Green" Consumption Proposals
- From: "Bill Sheehan" <zerowaste@grrn.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 18:07:04 -0400
== LEAD STORY ==
EU's "Green" Consumption Proposals Opposed by
American Companies
The Commission of the European Communities published
its Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy on February 7,
2001 (see the "pdf" file at
<http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/gpr/2001/com2001_0068en01.pdf>).
The Green Paper proposed a strategy to develop the market
for greener products -- ones that use fewer resources, have
lower impacts on the environment and reduce waste generation.
Some of the proposed strategies include adopting the "polluter
pays principle" by charging a lower tax on products that are
eco-labeled, developing manufacturer "take back" requirements
for product disposal, supporting and expanding eco-labels,
driving "green" products acceptance using government
purchasing power (termed public procurement in the report),
etc. The Commission has been gathering comments since
the publication of the document.
In response, the EU Committee of the American Chamber
of Commerce issued its position paper (see
http://www.eucommittee.be/Pages/fspop.htm) which
rejected several of the plan's proposals, including its
recommendation to introduce lower sales tax rates on
ecolabeled products -- a key element of the plan, according
to the Environmental News Service July 11, 2001 article
"U.S. Firms Reject European Tax Breaks for Green
Products."
Industry opposition could kill the proposal. Member
companies of the EU Committee of the American Chamber
of Commerce include AOL Time Warner, AT&T, Boeing,
Disney, FedEx, GE, IBM, Kodak, Procter & Gamble,
Reebok, as well as the largest oil companies and all three
of the largest American auto makers. In addition to rejecting
the "green" product tax breaks, the Committee also warned
that the proposal's aim to "green" government purchasing
could breach international trade agreements, namely the
Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) -- a
"plurilateral" agreement of Annex 4 of the WTO Agreement.
*******************
SOURCE: === RCA News July 2001 ===
Welcome to the digest of July 2001 news stories regarding
conserving forests by reducing demand for wood products.
Please feel free to forward this email to others who may be
interested in subscribing. For more information about
Resource Conservation Alliance (RCA), go to
<http://www.rca-info.org>.
To subscribe, unsubscribe or for more information about
the list, go to the RCA-News website at:
<http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/rca-news>.
###
******************************************
To post to the greenyes list,
email to: greenyes@grrn.org
Subscription information for
this list is available here:
http://www.grrn.org/general/greenyes.html
******************************************
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]