[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] Pres.-Elect Bush's Environmental Appointments
- Subject: [GreenYes] Pres.-Elect Bush's Environmental Appointments
- From: "Peter Anderson" <anderson@recycleworlds.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:13:11 -0600
fyi
InfoBeat - Bush picks called business friendly
By H. JOSEF HEBERT
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Testimony by three of President-elect Bush's
Cabinet nominees before the Senate this week could highlight a
fundamental shift from the Clinton years on environmental
protection.
Bush's choices to head the Environmental Protection Agency and
the departments of Interior and Energy espouse a more
business-friendly approach in dealing with everything from air
pollution and endangered species protection to public access to
federal land.
Environmentalists have stepped up their campaign against Gale
Norton, the former Colorado attorney general nominated as interior
secretary. Opposition to New Jersey Gov. Christie Whitman as EPA
administrator and former Sen. Spencer Abraham of Michigan as energy
secretary, has been less intense, but both are likely to face sharp
questions from Senate Democrats.
While all three are expected to win approval, the Senate
hearings Wednesday and Thursday will delineate the dramatic
philosophical differences between Bush and the outgoing Clinton
administration on protecting the environment and addressing the
country's looming energy problems.
For business groups and Western property rights advocates, the
shift is a long-awaited change from what they have viewed as overly
restrictive dictates from Washington. Many environmentalists,
meanwhile, fear the Bush nominees will roll back what they view as
significant environmental advances made under President Clinton.
The new administration will adopt ``more innovative,
market-based solutions to land management problems,'' says David
Riggs, a natural resource expert at the Competitive Enterprise
Institute.
He said Norton, a strong advocate of states' rights and property
rights, will provide ``an opportunity to rethink and reformulate
environmental policy'' as head of the federal government's leading
land agency.
Like Norton, Whitman also has favored greater business and state
involvement in environmental regulations. In contrast, the Clinton
EPA frequently clashed with states over environmental enforcement.
When Bush announced Whitman's selection to head the EPA, he
complained of Washington's ``central command-and-control mindset,''
prompting Whitman to reply that she knew what it was like ``to be
on the receiving end'' of federal mandates.
Both Norton and Whitman also have strongly advocated letting
businesses regulate themselves. They support state self-audit laws
through which companies may admit environmental wrongdoing but
escape penalties if they agree to correct the problems. The Clinton
EPA has criticized this approach as a loophole that lets polluters
off the hook.
Whitman, who appears Wednesday before the Senate Environment and
Public Works Committee, is expected to face tough questioning from
Democrats on the self-auditing issue as well as decisions to relax
New Jersey's environmental enforcement program.
Environmentalists fear Norton and Whitman will give states and
business interests broad leeway in dealing with a wide array of
issues including protecting natural resources, meeting air quality
standards and imposing limits on water pollution.
Business groups say they expect to find a more receptive ear on
such matters as opening federal land to oil and gas drilling,
softening Clinton requirements on cleaner diesel fuel and favorable
action on greenhouse emissions from power plants and new air
standards for microscopic soot.
These have been top priorities of the Clinton administration,
despite business arguments that the rules were overly restrictive,
too costly to meet and, in some cases, based on faulty or
incomplete science.
Bush's view on energy policy, expected to surface Thursday when
Norton and Abraham appear in back-to-back sessions of the Senate
Energy and Natural Resources Committee, also marks a decisive
philosophical split from the outgoing administration.
Bush has emphasized energy production, while the Clinton
administration has argued that America must cut its energy use
through conservation and a shift away from fossil fuels.
Both Abraham and Norton _ reflecting the views of Bush and Vice
President Dick Cheney _ have pressed for opening the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development. Clinton
vigorously opposed drilling in the refuge, once vetoing a spending
bill that would have allowed it.
Still, Abraham, who lost his Senate re-election bid in November,
is expected to find support among his former colleagues. They
likely will ask him about one thing, however: Why did he co-sponsor
legislation in 1999 abolishing the very Energy Department he now
wants to head?
_____________________________________________
Peter Anderson
RECYCLEWORLDS CONSULTING
4513 Vernon Blvd. Suite 15
Madison, WI 53705
(608) 231-1100/Fax (608) 233-0011
email: anderson@recycleworlds.org
web: www.recycleworlds.org
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]