[GreenYes Archives] -
[Thread Index] -
[Date Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]
[GreenYes] Other Coke boycotts
- Subject: [GreenYes] Other Coke boycotts
- From: Ann Schneider <schneiderann@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:18:45 -0800
Hi:
This is from a Voting Problem listserve in response to
boycotting companies that funded certain campaigns.
My purpose for posting this is to point out that GRRN's
Coke Campaign might want to link up with other groups
to spread the word. See paragraph 4 and perhaps the
site in paragraph 2.
Ann
FOR THOSE UNSURE ABOUT BOYCOTTS.. For Coca-Cola, things don't go better
with the Internet
From: Joan Storey <godessss@mindspring.com
http://www.prospect.org/archives/V12-01/devil2.html
Taking It to the Web
Susan E. Reed
For Coca-Cola, things don't go better with the Internet.
Behind the story of the company's recent settlement of a $192.5-
million lawsuit brought by black employees is a tale of how a few
determined activists used the Internet to create a public relations
nightmare for the soft-drink giant.
When Larry Jones, a former Coke manager, founded the Committee for
Corporate Justice, he did more than call for a boycott and organize
rallies. He also set up a Web site: CorporateJustice.org.
Jones posted, for all the world to see, the civil complaint
containing the detailed allegations of discrimination at the firm.
The site includes a list of the microscopic number of senior
management positions held by blacks as well as something no company
would want revealed: information on employees' salaries over a three-
year period, grouped by skin color. For details like these, the
average citizen used to have to go to the courthouse where the suit
was filed and pay to have reams of paper photocopied.
A site called boycottCOKE.com also has plagued the company. It
features articles about the suit and other alleged transgressions by
Coca-Cola worldwide. Here one finds news about everything from Mexico
launching a probe of the company's "alleged monopolistic practices"
to a report from Jordan about Coke cans being contaminated by
petroleum products. The Web site claims 20,000 visitors daily.
These Internet sites frustrate corporate public relations efforts by
keeping bad news readily available--and news of the discrimination
lawsuit has dogged Coca-Cola officials the world over. One official
was pestered by reporters in China asking questions about the
corporation's racial problems.
The stated goal of the anti-Coke Web sites, to promote a boycott,
didn't have any real effect on the company's $20 billion in sales
last year. But worry over continuing negative publicity and a
tarnished image helped bring directors to the negotiating table. The
international consulting firm Interbrand estimated that Coke's brand
fell in value by 13 percent from 1999 to 2000 owing to concern about
the lawsuit, a change of chief executives, and a recall of soft
drinks in Europe last year.
Plaintiffs against Coca-Cola emulated the protests of the 1960s with
bus rides and boycotts, but their use of the Internet kept pressure
on the company. Web activism doesn't fade away with the next news
cycle. Bad news just stays there, for anyone, anywhere, day or night,
to read.
[GreenYes Archives] -
[Date Index] -
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev] - [Date Next] - [Thread Prev] - [Thread Next]